Regarding the first question, I'm guessing that you're mixing this up with 
Kekule's discovery of the benzene ring. From Wikipedia:


In 1865 the German chemist Friedrich August 
Kekulé<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_August_Kekul%C3%A9_von_Stradonitz>
 published a paper in French (for he was then teaching in Francophone Belgium) 
suggesting that the structure contained a six-membered ring of carbon atoms 
with alternating single and double bonds. The next year he published a much 
longer paper in German on the same 
subject.[5]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene_ring#cite_note-4>[6]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene_ring#cite_note-5>
 Kekulé used evidence that had accumulated in the intervening years—namely, 
that there always appeared to be only one 
isomer<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomer> of any 
monoderivative<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative_(chemistry)> of benzene, 
and that there always appeared to be exactly three isomers of every 
diderivative—to argue in support of his proposed structure. Kekulé's 
symmetrical ring could explain these curious facts, as well as benzene's 1:1 
carbon-hydrogen ratio.

The new understanding of benzene, and hence of all aromatic compounds, proved 
to be so important for both pure and applied chemistry that in 1890 the German 
Chemical Society organized an elaborate appreciation in Kekulé's honor, 
celebrating the twenty-fifth anniversary of his first benzene paper. Here 
Kekulé spoke of the creation of the theory. He said that he had discovered the 
ring shape of the benzene molecule after having a reverie or day-dream of a 
snake seizing its own tail (this is a common symbol in many ancient cultures 
known as the Ouroboros<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros>). This vision, 
he said, came to him after years of studying the nature of carbon-carbon bonds. 
This was 20 years after he had solved the problem of how carbon atoms could 
bond to up to four other atoms at the same time. It is curious that a similar 
humorous depiction of benzene had appeared in 1886 in the Berichte der 
Durstigen Chemischen Gesellschaft (Journal of the Thirsty Chemical Society), a 
parody of the Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft, only the parody 
had monkeys seizing each other in a circle, rather than snakes as in Kekulé's 
anecdote.[7]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene_ring#cite_note-6> Some 
historians have suggested that the parody was a lampoon of the snake anecdote, 
possibly already well-known through oral transmission even if it had not yet 
appeared in 
print.[1]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene_ring#cite_note-rocke-0> Others 
have speculated that Kekulé's story in 1890 was a re-parody of the monkey 
spoof, and was a mere invention rather than a recollection of an event in his 
life. Kekulé's 1890 
speech[8]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene_ring#cite_note-7> in which these 
anecdotes appeared has been translated into 
English.[9]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene_ring#cite_note-8> If one takes 
the anecdote as the memory of a real event, circumstances mentioned in the 
story suggest that it must have happened early in 
1862.[10]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benzene_ring#cite_note-9>

________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 2:10 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Dreams,LSD,scientific discovery


Just trying to ascertain the veracity of some items in my long term memory: is 
it true that before the discovery of the Watson and Crick double helix thqt one 
of those guys had a dream of two snakes in formation similar to a double helix? 
 and did LSD experimentation gave insight re microsoft type like computer 
systems?

Michael Sylvester,PhD
Daytona Beach,Florida


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to