This is very close to what I have done in the past but I go through and only 
give 
50%--MUCH easier to calculate! And just as Joel indicated, I do it on an item 
by 
item basis, so that's enough punishment for any of my wrong-going. 

In fact, I just did this for the 7 students out of 38 who failed my first intro 
exam. 
Amazing how some students can just ace this stuff and others just struggle. But 
it works pretty well; I have some assurance that they now "get it" and they 
have 
some points added to their scores. I let them talk with anyone they want, so 
they 
can collaborate, but the answers have to be clearly distinct, and I make that 
point. I think they learn MORE from the collaborations during re-writes than 
from anything else I or they do.

Of course here is the easy way to move on: just curve the danged grades. Do a 
Z-score transformation or whatever, and move on.

STOP beating yourself up. I also agree with the person who said that the 
students had plenty of time to take responsibility for their own learning; AND 
you might start a dependency precedent. PLUS, never show any weakness--it 
will come back to haunt you.

I suspect you are looking at yourself first because the grade deficit was so 
much 
across the board, but it just may not be the case that it's you at all. I 
always 
remember the best advice I ever got as a young parent: children grow in spite 
of 
us, not because of us.

Annette


Annette Kujawski Taylor, Ph.D.
Professor of Psychology
University of San Diego
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110
619-260-4006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---- Original message ----
>Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:49:37 -0500 (CDT)
>From: "Joel S. Freund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
>Subject: Re: [tips] What would YOU do?  
>To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
<[email protected]>
>
>Carol,
>       When that has happened, I printed new copies of the exam, and wrote
>student's name on each. I did not give them the old exams, but I did give each
>person his or her total score, written on the top of the blank exam. I told the
>class that they had done very poorly, and that here was an opportunity to
>improve their grade. They were to take the test home, and to retake it. They
>could use their texts, but not their friends, dog, etc. I would regrade the 
>exam
>and add 60% of the increase in points. I graded the exams again, and on a
>question by question basis, calculated the increase in points, and added 60% 
of
>that number to their previous score. I ignored any questions on which they did
>more poorly, thus the retake could only help them. The result is they had to
>spend time with the material, and actually write answers.
>       The procedure seemed to go over well, and they learned the meaterial.
>
>
>               Joel
>
>
>
>
>       Joel S. Freund          216 Memorial Hall
>                               Department of Psychology
>                               Fayetteville, AR 72701-1201
>
>       Phone:  (479) 575-4256
>       FAX:    (479) 575-3219
>       E-MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Lord, give me patience, but I want it right now.  - anonymous
>Whoever is out of patience is out of possession of their soul. Francis Bacon
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, DeVolder Carol L wrote:
>
>:-)I recently gave an exam in my 300-level Brain and Behavior class, and my 
students bombed it. I mean really bombed it--every last one of them. For 
various reasons that don't matter, I do take the blame for it. I have been 
distracted and not doing a good job of teaching the course. That doesn't excuse 
the students from reading the text and knowing the material; it's basic but 
important stuff such as action potentials, lobes and their function, etc., but 
it 
can be difficult without help. My question is this: This particular exam is 
worth 
20% of their grade; they have 2 more exams, a paper, and activities, each worth 
20% of their grade (the activities sum to 20%). How can I correct for my part 
of 
their lousy performance? I feel we need to move on (the semester is nearing its 
midpoint), but I don't want them to go away from this course without 
understanding the material. Should I repeat coverage of the material and retest 
them? Should I give them a take-home assignment over it? Should I discard this 
test and work the material into their activities? I've never really had this 
happen 
before (thank goodness) and I don't want the students to suffer from my lousy 
job of teaching. What would others do?
>:-)Thanks,
>:-)Carol
>:-)
>:-)
>:-)
>:-)
>:-)
>:-)
>:-)Carol L. DeVolder, Ph.D.
>:-)Professor of Psychology
>:-)Chair, Department of Psychology
>:-)St. Ambrose University
>:-)518 West Locust Street
>:-)Davenport, Iowa 52803
>:-)
>:-)Phone: 563-333-6482
>:-)e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:-)web: http://web.sau.edu/psychology/psychfaculty/cdevolder.htm
>:-)
>:-)The contents of this message are confidential and may not be shared with 
anyone without permission of the sender.
>:-)
>:-)
>:-)---
>:-)To make changes to your subscription contact:
>:-)
>:-)Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>---
>To make changes to your subscription contact:
>
>Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to