I can actually tie the cricket thread directly to the teaching of 
psychology.....

        I have my Research Methods and Statistics students read a 2001 article 
from the Sydney Morning Harold.  It is by an Australian scientist, Charles 
Davis, who used z scores to determine who was the best athlete (based on career 
data).  He constructed distributions for several sports.  The measures he used 
varied, of course, among the sports - points per game for basketball, batting 
average for baseball, etc.  Then, for each sport he determined who had the 
highest z score.  This allowed him to compare accomplishments between sports 
and determine who was farthest from the average.

        So, who had the highest z score?  Cricket player Don Bradman, with a 
score of 4.4.

        For other sports, the best were:

        Basketball - Michael Jordan - z score of 3.4.
        Soccer - Pele - z score of 3.7
        Tennis - Bjorn Borg - z score of 3.15.
        Baseball - Ty Cobb - z score of 3.6
        Golf - Jack Nicklaus - z score of 3.5.  (NOTE - The author, in 2001, 
did acknowledge that Tiger Woods may eclipse this, but the z scores are based 
on entire careers).
        American football - Steve Young and Joe Montana, both 3.1.



Robert Lennartz, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
Indiana University Southeast
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to