Hi

I'm surprised Goldberger isn't in the list of researchers experimenting
on themselves.  I use this as one of my examples of the benefits of
experiments (even poorly controlled ones in some cases).

Here's the slide from correlation (nonexperiment) (apologies for the
ill formatting)

Pellegra: disease that once killed many poor southerners; 10,000 people
died in USA in 1915 alone
Correlation in South between pellegra and presence of indoor
sanitation
Dominant explanation became *germ theory*
Would improved sanitary conditions / practices reduce incidence of
pellegra?
More on pellegra shortly!

And later when talking about experiments (note the "filth" parties at
the end ... always gets disgusted sounds and facial expressions from
class):

Goldberger
Did not think that *germ theory* was correct or that sanitation was
causal factor
In institutions he observed that inmates got pellegra, but not staff 
Pellegra dietary rather than infectious disease?
Series of simple but compelling experiments
Better diet cured and prevented disease
11 inmates volunteered for corn diet; 6 became ill
*Filth parties*: Goldberger, wife, and assistants injected with
blood from affected people and later ate scrapings from scabs, urine,
and runny feces of ill; did not get ill


Early researchers on the effects of altitude also merit mention ...
some of them died when they passed out as their balloons reached certain
altitudes (and kept on going).

Take care
Jim


James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[email protected]

>>> <[email protected]> 19-Mar-09 9:29:25 PM >>>
Two goodies from _New Scientist_, which I feel compelled to share. The

newer, just published, led me to the older. Note that the term 
"experiment" is used here in its looser sense as systematic inquiry 
(although some of the "experiments" on these two lists barely qualify).

This is not the sense it is sometimes taught in psychology, which 
requires an investigation with randomized control and experimental 
groups. 

First the older: 
Top 10 bizarre experiments (November 2007)
http://tinyurl.com/bohgx6 

Some notes on the entries:

1) Elephants on Acid

Their header is a bit misleading because it was only one elephant.  I 
also remember a follow-up letter-to-the-editor  (Harwood, 1963) which 
termed this misadventure with drugs an "elephantine fallacy".  Harwood

argued that the perpetrators had made a grievous error in using body 
weight in scaling up the dose for an elephant from that appropriate for
a 
small mammal. This is because metabolic rate varies, not with body 
weight, but with surface area (of which elephants have a lot). 

There is enough weirdness surrounding this experiment to take up at
least 
the top five places by itself. For more on the elephant on acid, see:

http://tinyurl.com/36tk8w 

West LJ, Pierce CM, Thomas WD. (1962). Lysergic acid diethylamide: Its

effects on a male Asiatic elephant. Science, 138, 1100-1102.

Harwood, P. (1963). Therapeutic dosage in small and large mammals. 
Science, 139, 684-685.

2) Terror in the Skies

Imagine the reaction of an institutional review board (IRB) if it 
received a proposal for this experiment. But the United States Army
don't 
need no stinkin' IRBs (or else they didn't exist yet). 

4) The Look of Eugh, and come to think of it,  5) Reversing Death, and
8) 
Two-headed Dogs

Same thought about the IRBs. We've come a long way (I think).

9) The Vomit Drinking Doctor

Absolutely the most disgusting experiment ever carried out. Nothing
even 
comes close.  For more revulsion from this one (if you can stand it),
go 
to the newer essay in _New Scientist_ 

Eight scientists who became their own guinea pigs (March 11, 2009)
http://tinyurl.com/alwp3n 

The one with more on the vomit drinking doctor is the first one, headed

"The vomit sauna"

Don't you just love lists?


Stephen

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.          
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University      e-mail:  [email protected] 
2600 College St.
Sherbrooke QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada

Subscribe to discussion list (TIPS) for the teaching of
psychology at http://flightline.highline.edu/sfrantz/tips/ 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to