Only if you believe that ALL discriminations are inappropriate.
It is inappropriate to discriminate on the basis of religion.
It is NOT inappropriate to discriminate on the basis of a stated  
willingness to do a job as specified and contracted.

On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:41 AM, Michael Smith wrote:

>
>
> But do they? That was the point.
>
> "Would you hire a Christian Scientist to direct a public health  
> program?" Yes.
>
> Would a Christian Scientist not be able to direct a public health  
> program?
>
> If you are apriori excluding Christian Scientists from directing  
> public programs then that is discrimination based on religion.
>
> Could said minister be a creationist and still do his job  
> admirably? Yes.

But very unlikely.
We screen out unlikely candidates all the time.

>  Could Richard Dawkins impartially and sensitively carry out his  
> obligations as Chair for the Public Understanding of Science?

See my post on objectivity.

> Well, OK, some things aren't possible, but I think my main point  
> still stands.
>
> --Mike
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Paul Brandon  
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> When religious beliefs conflict with one's function as a science  
> minister they become relevant to job function.
> Would you hire a Christian Scientist to direct a public health  
> program?
> One has a right to one's beliefs; one does not have a right to hold  
> a job that one refuses (for whatever reason) to perform properly  
> (according to contract, job description, etc).
> And in this case it doesn't sound like there was any problem  
> knowing what his beliefs were (at least to the extent that they  
> compromised his support for science).
>
> On Mar 22, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Michael Smith wrote:
>
>> Hmmm. Seems all the good stuff happens when I'm not around.
>> (I wonder if that's a conspiracy...nah...can't be...I think)
>>
>> Why is it important to know his beliefs?
>>
>> Are we not supposed to hire people for positions without  
>> predjudice with regard to religion, color, sexual orientation etc?
>>
>> --Mike
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:24 PM, William Scott  
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Chris Green sez:
>> ------
>> "I think the major reason that attention
>> has suddenly become focused on the Science Minister is that his
>> government just cut the budgets of the major research funding  
>> agencies
>> as part of their "economic stimulus" package. Go figr."
>> ----------
>> But he, himself, objected to those cuts!!
>>
>> I'm taken with the following comments by Lorna Dueck in the  
>> Toronto Globe & Mail:
>>
>> "He made a defensive stumble in an environment he assumed would  
>> not allow the breadth of questions needed to explore Christianity  
>> and science. He drew the line around his faith tightly, with what  
>> appears to be a "Don't ask, don't tell" policy. The fact that we  
>> cannot intelligently explore a science minister's personal beliefs  
>> in God because it's deemed political suicide in a sound-bite  
>> culture should alarm us all about the erosion of our freedoms."
>>
>> While I agree that it is important to know his beliefs, I do  
>> understand the defensiveness which led to his statements.
>> >>> "Christopher D. Green" <[email protected]> 03/18/09 7:53 PM >>>
>> [email protected] wrote:
>> > Our Science Minister, (yes, our _science_ minister), with the proud
>> > title of federal Minister of State for Science and Technology, was
>> > asked whether he "believed in evolution".
>> >
>> >
>> And then...
>> > Shame on us.
>> >
>>
>> Indeed. However, it has been long known that the current Minister of
>> International Trade (and former Leader of the Opposition)  
>> Stockwell Day
>> is a "young Earth creationist." I think the major reason that  
>> attention
>> has suddenly become focused on the Science Minister is that his
>> government just cut the budgets of the major research funding  
>> agencies
>> as part of their "economic stimulus" package. Go figr.
>>
>> Chris
>
> Paul Brandon
> Emeritus Professor of Psychology
> Minnesota State University, Mankato
> [email protected]
>
>
> ---
> To make changes to your subscription contact:
>
> Bill Southerly ([email protected])
>
> ---
> To make changes to your subscription contact:
>
> Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Paul Brandon
10 Crown Hill Lane
Mankato, MN 56001
[email protected]




---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to