Hi

James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[email protected]

>>> "Mike Palij" <[email protected]> 17-Apr-09 6:54:53 AM >>>
Here's a question that one might consider when covering ethics
and topics such as Milgram's obedience to authority and related
issues:

When is it okay to violate ethical principles and even federal and
international laws?

JC:
When the laws are unjust or ill-founded?  Once illegal for people from 
different races to marry.  Currently illegal in some states and not others for 
gays to marry.  As Mike goes on to note, issue is very complex.  I wonder if it 
is better worded as having to do with where one draws line between 
appropriate/acceptable behavior and inappropriate/unacceptable behavior, and 
how external factors work into drawing that line?  If one's family was being 
threatened to coerce unacceptable behavior from us, would we be culpable in 
carrying out some barbarous act?  If one's country was being threatened, what 
is acceptable? (I realize these are not perfectly parallel, but wonder if the 
mind's of those endorsing torture work along these lines?)  Reminds one of some 
of Kohlberg's moral dilemmas (steal medicine or not?).

In the McDonald's incident, people (at least the manager's boyfriend) were 
found guilty despite attributing their behavior to "obeying" the policeman on 
the phone, as was the case with those tried at Neuremburg.

Mike:
P.S.  As a seperate exercise, we could also ask students to review
the research literature on the effectiveness of torture to elicit any useful
information.  If it turns out that torture produces unreliable information,
what possible justification could it have?

JC:
Raises a quandary doesn't it?  How can one properly research effectiveness of 
torture?  Clearly awkward (to say the least) to include torture condition in 
the research design.  Even if torture occurred outside confines of the 
research, would one be justified in using "knowledge" gained from those 
inappropriate (to most) actions?  I understand that there is (was?) debate 
about whether to use knowledge generated by the clearly unethical "medical" 
research conducted by Nazis.




---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to