Title: tag


Hi All,

Christopher D. Green wrote:


Thus, if the APA meant what it seemed to say, then it would have identified specific actions that it bans, not just use the currently contested term "torture."

APA did state in 2007 specific actions that it bans.  The ban includes (quoted from the 2007 Resolution; see previous email for the reference):

An absolute prohibition against the following techniques therefore arises from, is understood in the context of, and is interpreted according to these texts: mock executions; water-boarding or any other form of simulated drowning or suffocation; sexual humiliation; rape; cultural or religious humiliation; exploitation of fears, phobias or psychopathology; induced hypothermia; the use of psychotropic drugs or mind-altering substances; hooding; forced nakedness; stress positions; the use of dogs to threaten or intimidate; physical assault including slapping or shaking; exposure to extreme heat or cold; threats of harm or death; isolation; sensory deprivation and over-stimulation; sleep deprivation; or the threatened use of any of the above techniques to an individual or to members of an individual’s family. Psychologists are absolutely prohibited from knowingly planning, designing, participating in or assisting in the use of all condemned techniques at any time and may not enlist others to employ these techniques in order to circumvent this resolution's prohibition;

To Peace,

Linda
--
Linda M. Woolf, Ph.D.
Professor, Psychology and International Human Rights
Past-President, Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, & Violence (Div. 48, APA)
Webster University
470 East Lockwood
St. Louis, MO  63119


Main Webpage:  http://www.webster.edu/~woolflm/  
[email protected]

"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's (and woman's) best friend. . . .
Inside a dog, it's too dark to read."
                  -             Groucho Marx

Kiva - loans that change lives


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])


Reply via email to