Thanks, Mike. It was Salon.com in the link of today's NY Times that I picked
that stuff
up. I was wondering if at the annual conference in 2006 the 2005 policy was
repudiated
and changed. If nothing else, it showed a split among psychologists who seemed
to let
their Maimonides responsibility to do no harm be overridden by their
"patriotism" and
those who stuck to the view that psychologist are there to heal not hurt. I
wonder if the
split, in spite of the official policy, still exists. I'm sure it does. After
all,
psychologists are human, liberal, conservative, etc., like everyone else.
Make it a good day.
--Louis--
Louis Schmier http:/www.therandomthoughts.com
Department of History
Valdosta State University
Valdosta, Georgia 31698 /\ /\ /\ /\
(229-333-5947) /^\\/ \/ \ /\/\____/\ \/\
/ \ \__ \/ /
\ /\/
\ \ /\
//\/\/ /\ \_ /
/___\/\ \ \
\/ \
/\"If you want to climb
mountains \ /\
_/ \ don't practice on mole
hills" -/
\
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly ([email protected])
