Gee thanks Stephen!  I am familiar with Christopher's tome.  I checked amazon 
for another magician's account of  such things:  Ricky Jay's book on Learned 
Pigs and Fireproof Women..see: 
http://www.amazon.com/Learned-Pigs-Fireproof-Women-Ricky/dp/0374525706 
   The index does show clever hans and lady wonder and there is a Bertolotto in 
the index, but it is not likely the so-called blind horse you noted as it is 
not near the same pages of his discussion of horses.   thanks again, what a 
memory!   Gary
 
 
Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D.
Professor, Psychology
Saginaw Valley State University
University Center, MI 48710
989-964-4491
[email protected] 

>>> <[email protected]> 4/30/2009 9:50 AM >>>
I said, back in early March, when we were discussing the celebrated nag 
Clever Hans:

> Oskar Pfungst's brilliant elucidation of the true nature of Clever Hans'
> abilities notwithstanding, I've always been intrigued by a  statement in
> Nicholas Wade's (1980)_ article on the animal language wars (which makes
> "the War of the Roses look like a teddy-bears' picnic").
> 
> Wade was reporting,  facetiously, on a conference organized by the 
> linguist Thomas Sebeok for the New York Academy of Sciences. According to
> Wade:
> 
> "As noted by Sebeok [probably in his book _Speaking of Apes_--sb], Clever
> Hans had a French imitator called Clever Bertrand. Clever Bertrand could
> do everything that Clever Hans could do. There was only one difference
> between the two horses: Clever Bertrand was totally blind."
> 
> This is undoubtedly the first literally true blind study, and seems to
> rule out the Clever Hans effect.  So how did Clever Bertrand do it?

I now answer my own question, belatedly but, like an elephant, I never 
forget (NOT!). Anyway, I have to give back the library books, so it's now 
or never.

First Sebeok's enigmatic statement was not in _Speaking of Apes_, nor 
even in the report of the New York Academy Conference (1981), where he 
was alleged to have said it. He did write it, however, in an earlier book 
he edited, _How Animals Communicate_ (1977), p. 1068. He there tells us 
that there were many such clever beasts, including "talking" horses, 
learned dogs, reading pigs, and a "goat of knowledge". 

The horse, it turns out, was really called "Berto", and it "was blind yet 
gave excellent results when the attendant "thought that the questions had 
been written on its skin or uttered aloud" " [that quote within a quote 
was attributed to Katz, 1937]. 

The explanation for blind Berto's clever performance is simple, according 
to Sebeok. Fraud. He says " All of them were assiduously coached 
performers intentionally cued by their trainers, who were entertainingly 
exposed by the prominent American illusionist and historian of 
conjuration, Christopher (1970)".

So I went to Christopher. He describes a number of bizarre cases, 
including Lady, the Wonder Horse, who could "spell, add, subtract, 
multiply, divide, tell time, and answer questions", and who was claimed 
by the _New York World_ to "read minds, predict the future, and converse 
in Chinese", even predicting Harry Truman winning over Thomas Dewey in 
the 1932 election.  Now that's clever! 

Christopher recounts how he exposed Lady as a fake, but does not mention 
examining Berto. Presumably, then, the claim that Berto too was a fraud 
was by extrapolation from other exposed cases (unless an additional 
reference to a source in German,  Maday, 1914, which I didn't check, is 
the definitive one). But I have little difficulty in believing that fraud 
was the answer for blind Berto.

Stephen


Wade, N (1980). Does man alone have language? Apes reply in riddles, and 
a horse says neigh. Science, 208, 1349--

Sebeok, T., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). The Clever Hans phenomenon: 
communication with horses, whales, apes, and people. Annals of the New 
York Academy of Sciences, 364.

Sebeok, T. (1977). Zoosemiotic components of human communication. In: 
_How animals communicate_, ed. T. Sebeok, Indiana University Press. 

Katz, D. (1937). Animals and men: Studies in comparative psychology. 
London: Longmans, Green and Co.

Christopher, M. (1970). Ch. 3. ESP in animals.In _ESP, seers & psychics._ 
New York: Thomas Crowell.


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.          
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University      e-mail:  [email protected] 
2600 College St.
Sherbrooke QC  J1M 1Z7
Canada

Subscribe to discussion list (TIPS) for the teaching of
psychology at http://flightline.highline.edu/sfrantz/tips/ 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to