Typed?
Pencil?
What means these words?

On May 11, 2009, at 8:29 PM, [email protected] wrote:

>
> Absolutely!  Some of these students' problems with reading  
> comprehension and writing are not unlike those of  students whose  
> primary language is not English. There seems to be a real lack of  
> self-discipline in maintaining mindfulness in what they read. Of  
> course these problems are compounded by a lack of genuine interest  
> in learning and a number of bad habits that students have acquired  
> since grade school, such as not taking the time to print out a copy  
> of their paper to revise it. The result is that we end up getting  
> first drafts that are submitted as final products. When I remind  
> them of my requirement that their papers must be accompanied by an  
> earlier typed version with substantive penciled-in corrections,  
> they react as if I was from Mars.
>
> Miguel
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerald Peterson" <[email protected]>
> To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)"  
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 10:02:23 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [tips] Reality check/Reading compreh.
>
> Thanks Miguel!  An interesting issue here is that I suspect some  
> students have problems with reading comprehension, and this  
> presents even further challenges for them when attempting to  
> summarize or rephrase points or ideas in a paragraph they have  
> read.  Many students tell me they read the text or chapter but do  
> not understand anything. No wonder they miss my subtle wit!     
> Again, given the lack of reading experience in new students, this  
> lack of comprehension makes it very inviting to merely copy  
> everything and stay at a superficial level in their writing.
> I think it would be a useful class exercise to give students--as  
> you did here--some paragraphs and explore what the author was  
> saying, what the major point was, and what other ideas,  
> assumptions, suggestions might be found in that paragraph.  Then,  
> when it comes to summarizing it or paraphrasing, students should  
> have a better sense of how the points covered can be described  
> differently while retaining and giving credit to the key ideas the  
> author presented.  At the same time, such exercises, in groups or  
> as class activities, might help with problems of reading  
> comprehension.     Gary
>
>
> Gerald L. (Gary) Peterson, Ph.D.
> Professor, Psychology
> Saginaw Valley State University
> University Center, MI 48710
> 989-964-4491
> [email protected]
>
> >>> <[email protected]> 5/10/2009 9:05 pm >>>
>
>
> I agree that the Indiana site is one of the best ones to send  
> undergraduates to, especially because of that certificate of  
> completion that can be mailed directly to you.
>
> And for a little shameless self-promotion, in the future you should  
> consider having your students read my short piece in Eye on Psi Chi  
> titled "Avoiding those little inadvertent lies when writing  
> papers": http://www.psichi.org/Pubs/Articles/Article_666.aspx :
>
> Miguel
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul C Bernhardt" <[email protected]>
> To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)"  
> <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 8:32:11 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: RE: [tips] Reality check
>
> I am finding the same patterns increasingly. I do not think I have  
> become better at spotting the pattern. I think that there is an  
> increasing level of acceptance of these kinds of plagiarism,  
> possibly due to an attitude of "I got it off a web page, there is  
> no ownership on the internet, therefore, I can't be stealing."
>
> I, too, will have my students complete the Indiana University  
> School of Education (Bloomington) tutorial, requiring each supply  
> me with their certificate of completion by the end of the first  
> week of the course. Here's the link:
>
> http://www.indiana.edu/~istd/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DeVolder Carol L [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sun 5/10/2009 5:00 PM
> To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
> Subject: RE: [tips] Reality check
>
> Thank you all for your comments and suggestions. I have been  
> grading papers nonstop for several days now (with a brief recess  
> for graduation). Generally, what I am finding is that my C and D  
> students are the ones who are stringing together sentences that are  
> not their own. I start reading a paper that is grammatically poor,  
> maybe started with the phrase "In this paper I am going to talk  
> about..." and then suddenly shifts to a beautiful, fully-formed  
> sentence or set of sentences. Of course I Google it immediately and  
> sometimes have some luck, other times it doesn't come up. If I am  
> still suspicious, I go to the database and look up the original  
> article. Students sometimes reference the article, although there  
> have been some who have omitted references. Sometimes I find entire  
> paragraphs taken verbatim, other times I find phrases here and  
> there, interspersed with other phrases lifted from other articles.  
> I believe the student could not figure out a way to rephrase what  
> the article said, and took the lazy (and deceitful) way out. I  
> would rather have a poorly written paper(poor from a grammatical  
> standpoint) than one in which the student made no attempt to  
> understand the material. One the other hand, I had one student who  
> wrote her paper on stroke because both her sister and father had  
> strokes and she wanted to understand what happened in each case.  
> She told me that one of her articles was too difficult and she was  
> going to find an article that she could understand. I respect that.  
> I believe if I repeat this assignment, I am going to have all  
> students complete a plagiarism tutorial before handing in their  
> papers, and as Tim mentioned, I'm not going to wait until the end  
> of the semester to collect the papers. I can't remember which  
> school has the excellent plagiarism tutorial--one of the Indiana  
> Schools?
>
> Thanks again, I appreciate your collective insight. If nothing  
> else, I'm learning a great deal (though becoming somewhat more  
> cynical as I do).
>
> Carol

Paul Brandon
Emeritus Professor of Psychology
Minnesota State University, Mankato
[email protected]


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to