If Milgram was using an event recorder (which is consistent with apparatus technology at that time) then one is talking about yards of paper to measure and convert to shock durations, latencies, and progressions rates through the sequence for a session. At the least, one would need to normalize by individual. (Are Subject A and Subject B both both shocking faster than typical at this level--then you need to be able to compute what was typical for the individual subject.) Milgram was probably overwhelmed by the amount of data conversion. Finally, if one was missing a relevant transition point, time in session, shock level, etc. then the record is garbage.

I have used event recorders before and the mistake is not to record enough events so that you can measure transition/event probabilities/durations. That mistake is one reason why you see so little use of event/transition probabilites even though psychologists often talk about the importance of the sequence of events.

Ken



Jean-Marc Perreault wrote:
This is mentioned in his biography: The Man Who Shocked the World
(Blass, 2004). The exact reference to this is at the bottom of p. 79,
and top of 81 (as p.80 is a graph). The author states: Connected to the
schock machine was an apparatus that automatically recorded not only the
shock levels, but also the duration and latency of each shock to 1/100th
of a second.


Cheers.

JM
Jean-Marc Perreault
Chair, School of Liberal Arts
500 College Drive, PO Box 2799
Whitehorse, Yukon  Y1A 5K4 Canada

t 867.668.8867
f 867.668.8805

www.yukoncollege.yk.ca


-----Original Message-----
From: David Hogberg [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 7:54 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: Re: [tips] Milgram Study: how long the button was held down?

What I remember from the film is that he showed an event recorder (and a
sample of its record) to display latencies and button-down duration.  I
don't have access to the article right now, but as Jamie Davies said,
there was no mention of such data in his results section.  DKH

David K. Hogberg, PhD
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus
Albion College, Albion MI 49224
[email protected]                     home phone: 517/629-4834
Jamie Davies <[email protected]> 06/01/09 10:18 AM >>>
Both the latency and the duration of the shocks were measured by Milgram
(he
states this in his method section) however on a re-read of the original
article he doesn't refer to this in the results section.


---------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  [email protected]
Professor
Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA
---------------------------------------------------------------


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to