Benedict Carey in an article earlier this week in the NY Times 
reviews some recent research on blushing and the social functions
it seems to serve.  For details, see:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/health/02mind.html?ref=science

Given that TiPS is a text-based medium where face-to-face
interaction is not possible, all sorts of communicative cues are
absent (especially obvious cues to when one is being ironic
or sarcastic) but I have the feeling that if one reviews that posts
made over time one might find messages that one could predict
cause the author or person being discussed to blush.

Then again, given certain people's style of posting, it also seems
that some people never blush (NOTE: not that they cannot blush,
they just never appear to have the interpretation and emotional
reaction that would lead to a blush).

Then again, as good scientists, the most parsimonious position
would be that Tipsters don't blush because we have no evidence
that they do.  Some might argue that Tipsters are like ordinary
people and since ordinary people blush it is reasonable to infer
that Tipsters also blush.  I feel, however, that proving that Tipsters
are like ordinary people is an even harder proposition to support
than the proposition that they blush. :-) ;-) :-D

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to