I would have to say that the question is not a good example of unbiased item 
writing for a survey. The very question assumes that teaching publications are 
not substantive. I wonder if many readers of the question would then assume 
that maybe a teaching publication was a note in a teacher's newsletter (or a 
message to TIPS?) or some other non-substantive work. I would like to see it 
asked something like, "in your evaluations of faculty research that is 
published in peer reviewed scholarly journals, do you give less weight to 
research published in the area of teaching in your discipline?" I can imagine 
that there would still be a difference with such a question (more in Natural 
Sciences than Social Sciences I would guess) probably because the Natural 
Sciences don't consider teaching to be an area within the purview of Natural 
Sciences. Another issue would be what brings in the most outside funding to the 
department. I am guessing that there are many more lucrative areas of research 
in many areas of science than teaching in the discipline.

Rick

Dr. Rick Froman, Chair
Division of Humanities and Social Sciences
Professor of Psychology
Box 3055
John Brown University
2000 W. University Siloam Springs, AR  72761
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
(479)524-7295
http://tinyurl.com/DrFroman



From: Christopher D. Green [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 8:12 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] News: What Counts for Tenure - Inside Higher Ed


This will interest many TIPSters: 
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/07/20/polisci

Here's a snip: "Further, the survey found that the "scholarship of teaching" 
ideas of Ernest L. Boyer -- in which colleges would see research and 
publication related to pedagogy or teaching as "counting" -- has not been 
embraced by a majority of departments in any sector, and by relatively few at 
doctoral institutions. Asked if they agreed that "teaching publications and 
substantive publications are equal" in tenure reviews evaluating research, only 
11 percent of chairs at doctoral universities agreed. (The figures were 32 
percent for master's institutions and 43 percent for bachelor's institutions)."

Chris
--


Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada



416-736-2100 ex. 66164
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==========================


---

To make changes to your subscription contact:



Bill Southerly ([email protected])

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to