Dear Tipsters,

What do you think about the ubiquitous use of "looking to" when it means 
"hoping to" or "expecting to" "or "wishing to"? It annoys me. 

Am I an old fuddy-duddy who is not tolerant of one of our "natural" language 
evolutions or am I correct that there is a perfectly acceptable and more 
accurate existing term available?

Looking forward to your replies.

Sincerely,

Stuart
___________________________________________________________________

                 "Floreat Labore"
                            
         "Recti cultus pectora roborant"

Stuart J. McKelvie, Ph.D.,           Phone: (819)822-9600, Extension 2402
Department of Psychology,              Fax: (819)822-9661
Bishop's University,
2600 College Street,
Sherbrooke (Borough of Lennoxville),
Québec J1M 1Z7,
Canada.

E-mail: [email protected]
    or [email protected]

Bishop's University Psychology Department Web Page:
http://www.ubishops.ca/ccc/div/soc/psy
___________________________________________________________



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul C Bernhardt [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tue 11-Aug-09 8:33 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE: [tips] word confusions- one more
 
Here is Grammar Girl's take on "went missing".

http://grammar.quickanddirtytips.com/went-missing.aspx

She says that it is correct, a British usage dating to at least the 1940s that 
has gained a footing in the US recently. 

Paul C. Bernhardt
Department of Psychology
Frostburg State University
Frostburg, Maryland



-----Original Message-----
From: Patricia Santoro [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tue 8/11/2009 7:58 AM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: RE:[tips] word confusions- one more
 
Finally, someone can tell me if the term "went missing" is actually correct, as 
in: "The two hikers went missing shortly after sunset."
 
It sounds so wrong!
 
Pat Santoro
 

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])



---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to