Of course, that is assuming that the door isn't as deaf as a, well, you get the point :).
Christopher D. Green wrote: >Wow Mike P! That was SO divergent! :-) >Chris >========= > >Mike Palij wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:40:54 -0700, Carol DeVolder wrote: >> >>>> Elaborative and deep processing such as the following? >>>> >>> [Michael Sylvester channeling Khadafy/Gaddafi/Whatever wrote:] >>> There is some evidence that auditory instructional manuals are more >>> effective when recorded by females than males-something about the >>> female voice that commands attention.However,there is the exception >>> that the male voice is best for training a door. >>> >> >> I heard that this really depends upon the door. The male voice >> seems to work best when training METAL doors while female >> voices seem to work best when training WOOD doors. There >> may be 3-way interaction between gender of trainer, type of door, >> and what exactly the door is being trained to do, but one really >> doesn't hear enough about what doors are being trained to do >> these days. >> >> As for females voices commanding attention, I find this might be >> true for statement like "OOooooh! BAABY!" or "What the hell >> do you think you're doing??!??" but I could be wrong. >> >> -Mike Palij >> New York University >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> > > >--- >To make changes to your subscription contact: > >Bill Southerly ([email protected]) ---------------------------------- Deb Dr. Deborah S. Briihl Dept. of Psychology and Counseling Valdosta State University 229-333-5994 [email protected] --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([email protected])
