Hi Mike - Ekman has long been at UC San Francisco (Department of Psychiatry), 
and I believe is Professor Emeritus there.  Cheers....Scott


Scott O. Lilienfeld, Ph.D.
Professor
Editor, Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice
Department of Psychology, Room 473 Psychology and Interdisciplinary Sciences 
(PAIS)
Emory University
36 Eagle Row
Atlanta, Georgia 30322
[email protected]
(404) 727-1125

Psychology Today Blog: 
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-skeptical-psychologist

50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology:
http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-140513111X.html

Scientific American Mind: Facts and Fictions in Mental Health Column:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/sciammind/

The Master in the Art of Living makes little distinction between his work and 
his play,
his labor and his leisure, his mind and his body, his education and his 
recreation,
his love and his intellectual passions.  He hardly knows which is which.
He simply pursues his vision of excellence in whatever he does,
leaving others to decide whether he is working or playing.
To him - he is always doing both.

- Zen Buddhist text
  (slightly modified)




-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Palij [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:07 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Cc: Mike Palij
Subject: RE: [tips] Beyond analysis

On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:14:02 -0700, Scott O Lilienfeld wrote:
>Hi All - It's an intriguing collection indeed, but the description at the
>outset of the article isn't quite accurate.  Psychologists were asked to say
>what they didn't understand about themselves, not what they view as the great
>answered questions in psychology as a whole.  Still, quite entertaining
>nonetheless.  ...Scott

A point that may not be relevant but which I wonder about is the
following. Presumably "famous" psychologists were selected either
because (a) they somehow have a deeper insight into the problems
that concern them (by the way, I wish Marty Seligman luck in walking
and losing that weight) or (b) there is a gossipy interest in what
famous psychologists are concerned about and whether such concern
are profound or mundane (e.g., how to keep one's weight down).
But if someone surveyed a representative sample of psychologists,
would one find similar or different concerns?  And which would be
of greater interest: the concerns of the famous psychologists or the
concerns of "common" psychologists?  Anyone find it interesting that
none of their concerns involved teaching?

Or am I making too much of a little article in the "Health & Families"
section of a newspaper?

By the way, when I tried to access the blog listed at the end of the
story I got a "You are not authorized to view page"; see:
Researchdigest.org.uk/blog

Did it sense my less than appreciative attitude towards the piece?

Also, wasn't Paul Ekman at UC-Berkeley?  Has he gone into business
for himself now?  Incidentally, I agree with his positions and not the
Dalai Lama's.  And I never knew that Mike Posner was so mechanically
challenged.  I hope that light bulb changing behavior gets better.

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Esterson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 4:03 PM
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)
Subject: [tips] Beyond analysis

Beyond analysis: Inside the minds of the world's top psychologists

 From belief in God to the irresistible urge to flirt with the opposite
sex, there are some human impulses that even the biggest brains in
psychology are unable to explain. Here are their greatest unanswered
questions

http://tinyurl.com/ydcxrrx

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
information.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution
or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact
the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the
original message (including attachments).

---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to