I have been wondering about the report of that dream, because it is repeated so often--but without attribution. I looked at the 1966 English translation of Elements of Psychophysics (Vol I) and no mention of the date or a dream occurs in the text. (The translation of the volume was NIH-funded to celebrate the centennial of the publication of E of P. I guess we will need to wait until 2066 to see the translation of Vol. II).

E G Boring does the introduction to the translation and repeats the dream story--without attribution of course. Even more irritating is an article by Boring (1961), in which the date/dream story is higlighted several times, still without attribution.

However, Boring (1929/1950) does provide an interesting bit of info in his Experimental Psychology. Fechner wrote a book, "Zend-Avesta, oder uber die Dinge des Himmels und des Jenseits," which was published in 1851.

Boring (1929/1950, p. 279) notes: "Oddly enough this book contains Fechner's program of psychophysics..."

1851 would be a year after the famous dream and the dream/idea would still be fresh. The "Elements" contains mainly the results of the program

Google books has the Zend-Avesta online but my rusty knowledge of
German and the old font system have managed to block my efforts to find the psychophysics section. Perhaps another scholar will have better luck.

Happy Fechner's Day,

Ken

Boring, E. G. (1961). Fechner: Inadvertent founder of psychophysics. Psychometrika, 26, 3-8.


--

---------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  [email protected]
Professor and Assistant Chairperson
Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA
---------------------------------------------------------------



Christopher D. Green wrote:



Today is Fechner Day! It celebrates the day on which, according to legend, Gustav Theodor Fechner developed the psychophysical method by which an experimenter manipulates the intensity of a physical stimulus, and then asks (what we would now call) a participant what sort of change, if any, s/he perceives. By doing this repeatedly, one can build up a geometrical curve of the relationship between the physical and the psychological, and then fit a mathematical equation to that curve. Fechner found that the relationship is logarithmic. Smitty Stevens later decided that the relationship was a power function instead. The debate continues.

Chris
--

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

416-736-2100 ex. 66164
[email protected]
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==========================


---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])




---
To make changes to your subscription contact:

Bill Southerly ([email protected])

Reply via email to