You're very sweet, John, to worry about my feelings. I think I should have said that my feelings were only "virtually hurt." I should know the vagaries of the internet by now. No worries! Beth Benoit
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Serafin, John < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm glad you're laughing, Beth! Please don't have your feelings hurt by our > spam detection system. I'm just trying to figure out why this happens with > your posts. I most definitely do not consider your posts to be junk! I have > no idea what's going on here. Again, apologies that the term "junk mail" > appeared in my reply. > > John > -- > John Serafin > Psychology Department > Saint Vincent College > Latrobe, PA 15650 > [email protected] > > > > > From: Beth Benoit <[email protected]> > Reply-To: TIPS posts <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:14:35 -0500 > To: TIPS posts <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [tips] Name that word > > I'm laughing, but my feelings are also hurt. Junk mail??? Wow. I may > need to tune up academic, scholarly postings. > Beth Benoit > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Serafin, John < > [email protected]> wrote: > Ah, sorry for the grammatical errors in that. And, more importantly, > apologies to Beth on the *** JUNK MAIL *** designation in the subject line. > Our system tags suspected junk mail. I have no idea why your mail almost > always shows up that way, but if I reply, the reply includes that in the > subject line. Not intentional on my part. Anybody have any idea of why that > would happen with Beth's emails? We use Barracuda filtering software here. I > turned off filtering, but it still tags messages in this way. > > John > > --- > To make changes to your subscription contact: > > Bill Southerly ([email protected]) > --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([email protected])
