Stephen,
I've been in contact with "Skip" Beck the first author of the recent
Albert article and he has no idea where the "little" came from.
Stephen - you're answer sounds good to me.
Michael Britt
mich...@thepsychfiles.com
www.thepsychfiles.com
Twitter: mbritt
On Dec 20, 2009, at 2:24 PM, sbl...@ubishops.ca wrote:
[off-list]
On 20 Dec 2009 at 12:29, Britt, Michael wrote:
Good point Stephen. The link came from a trusted source on my end -
but still, I'm not sure where that person got the original link.
I'm afraid I live in fear of the evil Internet. Well, not really, but
perhaps just a little paranoid. And while I've got you on the
phone, I was wondering about my note about Little Albert, just a
little disappointed that there were no follow-ups on that
interesting question of yours.
Did you get any other responses which predated Daniel and
Eysenck?
Regards
Stephen
---
To make changes to your subscription contact:
Bill Southerly (bsouthe...@frostburg.edu)
