Peter Lawson writes: >I don't believe that the most important things we do to help >our students learn are really "things," but ways of approaching >life and people. I would be very interested in knowing precisely what you mean by this. The fact is that the majority of my intro-psych students do not learn many "things" (which I am interpreting to mean "knowledge of general theoretical approaches and specific theories in psychology), but I do hope to teach them the basics of a scientific approach to life--what it means to be skeptical about knowledge claims, and how to test these claims--especially with regard to psychological matters. Is this what you mean by "ways of approaching life and people" or do you have something else in mind? Jeff Ricker Scottsdale Community College Scottsdale AZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- philosophy of teaching intro psych Matthew Prull
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych Peter & Carole Lawson
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych Patrick O. Dolan
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych Johnna K. Shapiro
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych David Bennett
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych RICKER
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych RICKER
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych Peter & Carole Lawson
- Heart transplant recipients Matthew Isaak
- Re: Heart transplant recipients Don Allen
- RE: philosophy of teaching intro psych Dr. Kristina Lewis
- Re: philosophy of teaching intro psych Paul C. Smith
- Philosophy of Teaching Intro Psych Pollak, Edward
- Fwd: philosophy of teaching intro psych Psychsigjm
- Re: Philosophy of teaching intro psych Janice Swartz
- Re: Philosophy of teaching intro psych SNRandall
