The March/April, 1999 issue of The Sciences (published by the New York 
Academy of Science)has a number of interesting articles, some of which 
touch on topics that appeared in Tips recently.

There is a short piece discussing an article from the November issue of 
Neuropsychologia that demonstrated that people who are naturally 
ambidextrous had 10% lower reading scores and 15% lower math scores than 
those who were right handed or left handed.  The participants were 
tested when they were 11 for math, reading and handedness.  Some brain 
speculations are presented for an explanation but no brain data were 
examined, as far as I can tell. The author talks about "hemispheric 
indecision" as a possible cause of the problem. To quote the article 
"Crow now suggests that ambidexterity arises when a developing brain 
takes too long to decide which hemisphere to favor."

The journal also has an interesting article by Richard DeGrandpre, a 
psychologist and author of Ritalin Nation: Rapid-Fire Culture and the 
Transformation of Human Consciousness.  In the article he complains that 
"Many neuroscientists are all too quick to call a blip on a brain scan 
the reason for behavior."  He criticizes the confusing of correlation 
and causality in brain scan research and the dualist assumptions of the 
brain scan researchers (as well as the media).

Finally, there is an interesting discussion of the relationship between 
science and religion as part of the book reviews of 3 books written on 
this topic.  The review is by Margaret Wertheim, who has written herself 
about the relation between science and religion.

I recommend all of these as good reads!

Jeff Nagelbush
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ferris State University
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to