On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, Kenneth M. Steele wrote: > > The 7 +/- 2 is an empirical generalization. > > I have always found the Miller article funny... It starts with the line <quoted loosly from memory> "I have been haunted by an integer..." Great opening line! However, in the extsnsive set of studies he reviews, not a single one is summarized by an integer. And, even if we rounded off to the nearest integer, that integer is not always seven! Like Ken said, an empirical generalization (with a catchy but ultimately misleading title...) -- Jim Dougan
- Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? RICKER
- RE: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Paul C. Smith
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Jim Clark
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? J. K. Shapiro
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Kenneth M. Steele
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Jim Dougan
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Mark Casteel
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Claudia Stanny
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Ron Blue
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Patrick O. Dolan
- Re: Is 7 +/- 2 a myth about short-term memory? Claudia Stanny
