Ouch!  

Karl presented our TIPS discussion on red ink to his 
students and got some pretty unflattering comments.  >
"They don't have anything better to discuss?"
>     "They don't have anything better to discuss?"
>     "Get a life."
>     "You are kidding, aren't you?"
Taken out of context (which I'm soothing my bruised ego by
supposing), I suppose our discussion might seem to be on a
rather inconsequential topic.  But this situation might also
engender further discussion in a classroom about how
presentation can result in a fundamental attribution error.
Certainly it would apply in an undergrad stats class, where
the wording of a question can bias the results of a survey.

For example:
Presentation 1:  Our TIPS group has had a discussion for
days now about what color ink we should use to grade papers.
I think about 25 different contributions were posted.  Most
of them said there's no reason not to use red, but some said
students get turned off by it, so maybe you should use
another color like green.   What do you think about that?

Presentation 2:  A student complained to his professor that
he was culturally offended by the use of red ink to correct
his paper.  The professor, wanting to know if there was any
basis to his complaint, asked other TIPS members if they'd
ever heard anything about problems with use of red ink.  It
opened up a very interesting discussion with members
offering cultural possibilities (but none negative against
red ink, except possibly in Korea where red represents
death) and ultimately concluding that probably any color you
use to correct papers can ultimately result in negative
feelings, probably because of the nature of correction
itself.  What are your thoughts?

Beth Benoit
University of Massachusetts Lowell


----------
>From: "Karl L. Wuensch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Use of red ink
>Date: Thu, Apr 22, 1999, 4:56 PM
>

>      I shared with my students (in undergrad stats) the concerns
> many of you
> have expressed about the color of ink used to grade or comment
> student papers.
> The most common responses of my students were:
>
>     "They don't have anything better to discuss?"
>
>     "Get a life."
>
>     "You are kidding, aren't you?"
>
>      I guess that means they don't mind that I use red ink.
> Actually, a large
> proportion of my editorial comments to them are in email.  While
> those appear
> green on my screen as I type them (or red if my spelling checker
> finds a word
> not in its dictionary), the color when the student reads my mail
> depends on
> the settings in effect in the student's mailer.
> 

Reply via email to