With full respect to the legitimate point Annette is making, my pet peeve
forces me to point out that one characteristic of science is clear
communication and careful use of language.
On Sat, 24 Apr 1999, Annette
Taylor wrote:
>
> Needless to say, and here I sit embarassed and upset, I went off
> like a roman candle LITERALLY.
>
>
Hardly likely, I think.
*****
Tom Allaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Algoma University College
1520 Queen St. E.
Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 2G4
CANADA
705-949-2301 X209
- IS psychology a science? Annette Taylor
- Re: IS psychology a science? Charles M. Huffman
- Re: IS psychology a science? Paul Brandon
- Re: IS psychology a science? Jim Clark
- Re: IS psychology a science? Dawn Blasko
- Re: IS psychology a science? Dave Johnson
- Re: IS psychology a science? Mike Scoles
- Re: IS psychology a science? Dawn Blasko
- Re: IS psychology a science? Tom Allaway
- Re: IS psychology a science? William McCown, Ph.D
- Re: Is psychology a science? Michael Tagler
- defining anxiety Michael Sylvester
- Re: defining anxiety Dr. Joyce Johnson
- Re: defining anxiety Paul Brandon
- Re: defining anxiety Mike Scoles
- Re: IS psychology a science? RICKER
- Re: IS psychology a science?An update Annette Taylor
- Re: IS psychology a science? RICHARD PISACRETA
- Re: IS psychology a science? RICKER
