|
Hi:
On an intuitive, experiential basis -- the
advice makes sense to me. When I mark papers, I make a point of finding
something that is praiseworthy as well as going into detail about errors and
areas for improvement. I think that I really learned to give constructive
and detailed criticism in a positive way when I was asked by a colleague to
review his dissertation. I wanted to give him the best advice that I
possibly could and to detect every possible weakness before the paper went to
his committee. I also wanted to maintain a good relationship with a
colleague. To accomplish these goals, I learned to translate comments such
as "'It" should not be used without an antecedent" into "I
think that your writing would be more powerful if you omitted "it" at
the beginning of a sentence and replaced it with ...." I have been
told by students that they really appreciate my identifying the good as well as
the not so good ... they have told me that they feel "safe" because
they know that I will find something positive in a paper -- even if it is only
"that was a good word."
On a personal level, I've golfed with two
different people -- both of whom offer advice. Imagine that I've tried an
easy shot and missed not only the pin but also the green! Person A is
likely to snarl "Well -- it went exactly in the direction you
shot." Person B is likely to say "Your stance was good and the
weight was right but you needed to pay more attention to
orientation." My score is a lot better when I golf with Person B and
I feel a lot better about my game and myself...which I why I now avoid golfing
with Person A. So, I think there's something to be said for administering
"a spoonful of sugar" along with the medicine.
Val.
Dr. Valerye McDonald
Professor Psychology Department University College of the Fraser Valley Abbotsford, B. C., Canada |
- RE: Learning to study or not Val McDonald
- RE: Learning to study or not Paul C. Smith
