It appears that some individuals may use their ethnicity,race and
lifestyle as a way of collecting money.These individuals would claim that
their property was destroyed by hate mongers,when in reality they set fire
to their own homes in order to collect insurance money.
So maybe there is a need to review those alleged anti- attacks and verify
to what extent some are genuine or some are staged.
Are there statistics on this?
Along different lines,I often wonder as to attorneys who defend clients
responsible for the victimization of the attorney's identity group.
There was a case of a black attorney who defended a cross-burning klansman
and the U.S has deported individuals and those individuals have been
legally assisted by attorneys of the historically victimed group.
Does that mean that legality surpasses moral rectitude?
And how about cognitive dissonance?
Are attorneys immune from cognitive dissonance or do they have a more
effective way of dealing with it?
or to use the words of one of my favorite rock groups AC/DC
"Money talks".
Michael Sylvester
Daytona Beach,Florida
