Tara Kuther wrote:

> Tipsters--
>
> Last night during a discussion of dominant-recessive inheritance in a
> Child Development course, I used eye color as an example (the classic
> brown = dominant, blue = recessive). The text mentions that gray, green,
> blue, and hazel eyes are recessive to brown, prompting a student to ask
> what happens when a child inherits two different recessive alleles (say,
> blue and green)?
>
> Looking through the archives I found a few posts on eye color changes,
> that I recalled from last year, but nothing on this. What do you think?
>

A couple years ago, I wrote the following post about eye color. Perhaps
this will help:


> From:   IN%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 17-SEP-1997 04:07:48.86
> Subj:   Update on Inheritance of Eye Color
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> TIPSters,
>
>      I was unsatisfied with the answer that I gave as to the question of
> the
> inheritance of eye color; so I looked at a few general textbooks of human
> genetics to see what they had to say about this question. It seems that
> several
> people on TIPS expressed an interest in the genetics of eye color, so I
> thought
> it might be of general interest to post the results. Levitan (1988,
> _Textbook
> of Human Genetics_ [3rd edition], New York: Oxford University Press)
> stated
> that:
>      the absence of pigment in the outer part of the iris causes the eye
> to
>      appear blue for the same reason that an uncloudy sky appears blue:
> as
>      light is scattered (...by the   unpigmented iris diaphragm in the
> eye),
>      the portion with shortest wave length, the  blue, is scattered most
> and
>      reflected back to the eye of the beholder. A pigmented iris absorbs
>      light and reflects back a color, green, hazel, or brown, depending
> on
>      the nature and intensity of the pigment present. (p. 342)
> He reported that there is a continuous variation of eye color between
> blue and
> dark brown, and that it has not been a simple task to classify these
> color
> variants:
>      Attempts to erect meaningful genetic classes such as blue, yellow,
>      green, hazel,light brown, and dark brown within this continuous
> spectrum
>      generally have been unsuccessful. This is especially true in the
> lower
>      part of the range, where persons with small amounts of pigment and
>      completely pigmentless eyes are very difficult to  distinguish, all
>      referred to as "blue" by the layman. (p. 342)
> He suggests that there are three loci (genes), each with two variants
> (alleles), where the uppercase allele at each locus produces pigment and
> the
> lowercase allele produces no pigment: P1/p1, P2/p2, P3/p3. The greater is
> the number of pigment alleles inherited by a person, the darker is
> his/her
> eyes.
>
>         In fact, a book by Mange & Mange (1990, _Genetics: Human Aspects_
> [2nd
> edition], Sinauer: Sunderland, Mass.) included a table that makes this
> hypothesis explicit. They modified an eye-color classification scheme
> developed
> by Francis Galton (1889, _Natural Inheritance_) and included the number
> of
> pigment alleles that might be associated with each eye color:
>
>                 Eye Color                 Hypothesized # of Pigment
> Alleles
>
>                 light blue                      0  (p1/p1, p2/p2, p3/p3)
>                 blue                            1  (e.g., P1/p1, p2/p2,
> p3/p3)
>                 blue green                      2  (e.g., P1/p1, P2/p2,
> p3/p3)
>                 hazel                           3  (e.g., P1/p1, P2/p2,
> P3/p3)
>                 light brown                     4  (e.g., P1/P1, P2/p2,
> P3/p3)
>                 brown                           5  (e.g., P1/P1, P2/P2,
> P3/p3)
>                 dark brown/black                6  (P1/P1,P2/P2,P3/P3)
>
> But they stated that (as of 1990, at least) the inheritance of eye color
> has
> not yet been worked out. They asserted that it is virtually certain,
> however,
> that the trait is polygenic in nature. This is an assertion that they
> repeated
> in 1994 in another book (_Basic Human Genetics_, Sinauer: Sunderland,
> Mass.):
>      It turns out that eye color is a complex rather than a simply
> inherited
>      trait, and--although alleles for darker colors tend to be dominant
> over
>      alleles for lighter colors--several loci are probably involved, and
> it is
>      possible for two blue-eyed parents to   produce a brown-eyed child.
> (p. 80)
> They quote one famous geneticist, Victor McKusick, as saying that, "My
> monozygotic twin brother and I, brown-eyed, had blue-eyed parents and
> blue-eyed
> sibs" (p. 80). They don't mention whether or not it was this fact that
> caused
> him to take up the study of genetics in the first place.
>
>         From what I can tell, the "myth" that eye color is a single-gene
> trait
> with a dominant brown-eyed allele and a recessive blue-eyed allele is due
> to
> the finding that, in some family pedigrees, it seemed to be inherited as
> such.
> I would bet that a further reason why this myth has been propagated is
> that it
> makes a nice, neat story that helps in the teaching of basic genetics to
> undergraduates.
> --

Jeffry P. Ricker, Ph.D.          Office Phone:  (480) 423-6213
9000 E. Chaparral Rd.            FAX Number: (480) 423-6298
Psychology Department            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scottsdale Community College
Scottsdale, AZ  85256-2626

"The truth is rare and never simple."
                                   Oscar Wilde

"No one can accept the fundamental hypotheses of scientific psychology
and be in the least mystical."
                                   Knight Dunlap

Reply via email to