And -- if Rush Limbaugh is to be believed -- a recent study links
increased probability of drug abuse (and other negative outcomes) to
spanking.  I caught part of his rant last week on the topic of this
study, but missed the cite.  Part of his rant was 'What kind of weirdo
would look for such a correlation?'  (You guessed it -- liberal
professors/researchers who's agenda includes the destruction of the
American family, and hence America.)  This from a guy who brags that he
dropped out of college (and, was therefore, was not corrupted by weirdo,
liberal, pinko college professors).  See:
http://www.nlspac.org/limbaugh/reid1.html for a little background.

I can understand students having problems accepting the anti-punishment
position -- at least, initially.  What I cannot understand is how
someone can get to the position of Instructor/Professor of psychology
without having a full understanding and full knowledge of the
behavioristic position against punishment.

Nor can I understand why anyone could not imagine that there are
alternatives to spanking other than "letting them get away with it". 
Discipline=Whacking??  Of course, with sites like
http://209.238.187.185/  (click on "spanking), what chance do we have? 
When it comes to authority, even Skinner doesn't begin to measure up to
God.

 

"Dr. Kristina Lewis" wrote:
> 
> Michael Sylvester wrote:
> 
>         ....my students tend to agree that psychology's  negative and
> unfavorable attitude towards punishment,spanking and rigid discipline of
> children may be one of the reasons that some of our youth have grown
> problematical in behavior and social civility.
> 
> Although I don't have time to dig up the appropriate references at the
> moment, I cannot let this post go unanswered.  This is the kind of poor
> thinking that  we would like to counter, not encourage in students.
> 
> There is a large literature documenting the negative effects of punishment.
> In a nutshell, punishment does not teach acceptable behavior, produces
> negative emotional side effects, and models aggressive behavior as an
> appropriate response.
> 
> Authoritarian parenting need not include physical punishment.  Certainly in
> some cultural contexts authoritarian parenting is more acceptable and
> perhaps more effective, but as far as I know there is no evidence that
> physical punishment contributes to effectiveness.
> 
> There are complex societal/cultural reasons for the level of inappropriate,
> aggressive, some might say disrespectful behavior that seems more prevalent
> in (some of) today's youth.  We perhaps should share in the blame, but not
> for failing to support the use of spanking and other physical punishment.
> 
> Kris Lewis
> Saint Michael's College
> Colchester VT
> 
> who would respond at more length but she has to write an exam for History of
> Psych, and who would welcome references to back her up if anyone as them at
> hand.

-- 
----------==========>>>>>>>>>> τΏτ <<<<<<<<<<==========----------
John W. Nichols, M.A.
Assistant Professor of Psychology & Computer Science
Tulsa Community College
909 S. Boston Ave., Tulsa, OK  74119
(918) 595-7134

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home: http://www.tulsa.oklahoma.net/~jnichols/home.html
MegaPsych: http://www.tulsa.oklahoma.net/~jnichols/megapsych.html

Reply via email to