Tipsters, is anyone aware of more recent info regarding the status of the
classical Schacter and Singer study on arousal and attribution? My psycinfo
searches revealed little. I vaguely recall problems with actual replication
of this study. However, while the idea of undifferentiated arousal was
mistaken, I thought the role of contextually induced attribution for the
arousal was established. Anyone with more recent references? I want to
update my coverage of this classic next semester. Thanks for any info.
Searchingly, Gary Peterson
Gerald (Gary) L. Peterson, Ph.D.
Professor, Department of Psychology
Saginaw Valley State University
University Center, MI 48710
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1-517-790-4491
