On Sun, 19 Mar 2000 12:43:12 -0500 "Michael J. Kane"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ken wrote:
> Tipsters interested in this issue should also note:
>
> Clancy, S. A., Schachter, D. L., McNally, R. J., & Pitman R. K.
> (2000). False recognition in women reporting recovered memories
> of sexual abuse. Psychological Science, 11, 26-31.
>
>
> **This is an interesting finding, but I was surprised at how
> **statistically weak the effect was, given its publication in
> **Psych Science.
> **Overall, neat effects, but not particularly robust. Of course,
> **the sample sizes here were understandably small (ns = 12-15
> **per group). It will be interesting to see whether successful
> **replications come down the pike...
>
> **Mike
>
Urps! And I illustrate the danger of citing a study after
reading only the abstract. Honest, I was going to read the full
article.
Ken
>
> *****************************************************
> Michael J. Kane
> Psychology Department
> Georgia State University
> University Plaza
> Atlanta, GA 30303-3083
> phone: 404-651-0704
> fax: 404-651-0753
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------
Kenneth M. Steele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Psychology
Appalachian State University
Boone, NC 28608
USA
