Jell-O, folks:
In a message dated 9/10/00 9:31:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
3. We truly do not know what important flaws might be in the
studies without complete access to everything that was done. >>
I took a lot at the article -- a mighty tedious read. But in one section, the
authors mention that an experiment allowed people to bring their friends
along to the lab to act as senders or receivers (I forget which) and this
pretty much seems an example of what Jim is talking about above.
They have had to look THAT hard, at SO many studies. It has the feel of
"We'll look until we find what we want, or make it happen..."
Nancy Melucci - LAHC
Huntington Beach, CA
