> > >The violation occurs in the fact that no one has been able to identify
any
> > >physical radiation of any known energy source during brain activity
that
> > >can be detected beyond the skull.
>
> And then Miguel Roig wrote:
>
> >So, because the mechanism for a phenomenon cannot yet be accounted for,
we
> >should toss out any evidence of the phenomenon?
I am not a great fan of ESP. I find it interesting that some cases of
strong
statistical violations has been observed that is suggestive of support for
ESP. ESP
is possible from a quantum entanglement point of view. The energy
requirements for this
is zero.
The reason we do not see strong evidence is because of local conditions
which collapse
the quantum wave front into a classical interpretation. ESP is possible IF
there is classical
confirmation in the future. In other words FEEDBACK from the future to the
present or
past can occur.
A problem is that it is likely that there are many universes so that quantum
feedback from all the universes
should create randomness for our local condition. This means that local or
classical conditions then would
be most predictive of future events.
In my opinion universes probably communicate through gravity creating an
averaging or centering phenomenon.
This averaging effect now changes the probability for the likely hood of ESP
events because more than one universe is
signaling the same outcome in the future. What this means in experiments is
that I should observe strong statistical
support some of the time but not all of the time. It would not be possible
to know which current ESP event is
true or false, only the future will confirm or refute them. Also the
feedback can be used to change the future and thereby
make the ESP unreliable for predicting the future for a local condition.
Ron Blue
http://turn.to/ai
