An alternative interpretation of existing situations that is compatible with much of what goes on at psychological conventions is that psychology may be scientific, but psychologists are not necessarily. And not just the clinicians. Science if by nature self correcting. It may just take much longer for our erroneous hypotheses to be corrected, due to the nature of the subject. As a result we tend to cling tenaciously to what we learned in graduate school.
- efficacy studies Chuck Huff
- Re: efficacy studies Gerald Peterson
- RE: efficacy studies Bill McCown, Ph.D.
- RE: efficacy studies QuantyM
