I think this idea, about stressing students, is a bit mean.  It also violates
the bond of trust between teachers and students.  Look at it this way:  Would
it pass an IRB?  What was the pedagogocal benefit, and did it outweight the
cost?  Or did it just enable the teacher to engage in a bit of enjoyment of
power?

A similar protrayal of the use of power:  Several years ago, I chanced to
give a major test on St. Patrick's Day.  As I am Irish myself, I joked that I
would give 2 bonus points to anyone wearing all green to the test, and then I
forgot I'd said that.  On entering the classroom on the 17th I notoced that
something was jarringly different.  With a shock I realized that the WHOLE
ROOM was a sea of green.  I called my fellow profs in for a look!


Karen K Block wrote:

> Dear TIPsters,
>         I love this antic, but take pause that it may be ethically
> questionable.  Could you help me decide?
>         My student, intending to teach the topic of "stress", used an
> interesting activity.  She had, at the outset of her course told the
> students what the ground rules were:  so many tests, required
> participation, no pop quizzes, etc.  On the day allocated to"stress", she
> entered the classroom, and in a commandeering way told the students
> ..."Today we are having a little quiz"...."get out one half sheet of
> paper, please"  Faces dropping, paper tearing, students looking perplexed
> and a little unbelieving and a lot betrayed.  She used the moment well."
> I am going to dictate the quiz question.  Please write it down carefully
> and then we will have ten minutes to answer.  Thank you, and I look
> forward to reading your answer."
>         "Now, she said, Listen Up...."  (Silence prevailed and tension
> mounted).  She then spoke the quiz question slowly, very slowly, word by
> word, ostensibly so students could write down the question.  She said,
> slowly and deliberately, so they could take word for word dictation.....
> "There......is...........no................................quiz."  Of
> course there was collective relief.  And then she could relate their
> experience and feelings to "stress."
>         Now I thought this was rather cool and wish I had thought of it.
> But then I realized deception was involved.  One of my more conservative
> students said,...Suppose one of her students had a heart problem!..And so
> I wondered what everyone here thinks inasmuch as this is a thoughtful
> bunch re:   what one actually says to students and how one interacts with
> them under the testiest of conditions at times.
>         When I took her a bit to task, she averred that this was not her
> idea and she had read it in some TIPS-approved publication.  Then I
> thought perhaps my thinking was just too IRB reactionary and her teaching
> behavior was justified given the instructional point.
>         This is clearly an issue needing collective wisdom.  Thanking you
> in advance for any true light you might shed on this matter.  KB

Reply via email to