At 3:47 PM -0600 2/12/01, Hank Goldstein wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>I've been on sabbatical from TIPS for a while, and now that I've returned
>to active duty I find the same old situation of post- after- post
>responding to the misinformed and uninformed statements and questions of
>M. Sylvester. I'm very likely to be criticized for this post, but I have
>broad shoulders (and, unfortunately, a very tiny cerebrum).
>
>Since he (Michael S.) obviously has not learned much, except that he can
>continue to provoke some of us, why do we keep spending time responding to
>his queeries (the misspelling is intentional!)? I hate us to take a hiatus
>from Michael S., but that's what I'm proposing. How's them apples?
I tend to disagree with much of what Michael posts, but most of it is also
neither original nor unique.
There's some value in rehearsing and modeling ways to deal with these
common misconceptions.
* PAUL K. BRANDON [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Psychology Dept Minnesota State University, Mankato *
* 23 Armstrong Hall, Mankato, MN 56001 ph 507-389-6217 *
* http://www.mankato.msus.edu/dept/psych/welcome.html *
