http://www.businessweek.com:/print/magazine/content/01_28/b3740034.htm?mainwindow

JULY 9, 2001

BOOKS
BY By Paul Raeburn


The Crack-Up of Psychiatry


OUT OF ITS MIND
Psychiatry in Crisis: A Call for Reform
By J. Allan Hobson and Jonathan A. Leonard
Perseus 292pp $26

Each year, about 1,200 slots are available at U.S. hospitals for medical
students who want to train as psychiatrists. Once, those positions
attracted the best and brightest medical graduates. Now, only a third of
those places are filled by American medical students--most of them drawn
from the bottom quarter of their class.

The decline in psychiatry has been matched by a deterioration in the
availability of mental-health care: The number of patients in public
mental hospitals has fallen from a peak of 558,000 in 1955 to 60,000
today. Meanwhile, an estimated 5 million Americans suffer from such
illnesses as schizophrenia, manic-depression, autism, depression, or
obsessive-compulsive disorder. Many of those who would once have been
treated, however badly, in mental hospitals are now on the streets, in
homeless shelters, or in prison. Some receive no treatment at all.

In Out of Its Mind, J. Allan Hobson, a psychiatrist at Harvard Medical
School, and Jonathan A. Leonard, a writer, paint a terrifying picture of
the collapse of American psychiatry and the toll it has taken on the
mentally ill. The book--likely to provoke outrage even among those who
have never thought about these questions--is all the more disturbing
because the decline in care has occurred during a period when scientific
advances have led to a variety of new psychiatric drugs. The drugs,
Hobson and Leonard write, provide "a real chance for large numbers of
severely afflicted mental patients to have at least a semblance of
normal life."

Out of Its Mind begins with a history of American psychiatry, showing
how and why it has fallen so far. The authors next provide a long
section detailing recent advances in brain science, including Hobson's
own work on dreams. And they conclude with a series of proposals to
rejuvenate psychiatry and transform the care of the mentally ill in the
U.S. Their indictment of the present system is so devastating, however,
that their optimism about the future sounds hollow.

Psychiatry arose in the 19th century, when its main role was to provide
custodial care for the mentally ill. Little was known about the causes
of mental illness, and even less about treatment. In the early 1900s,
researchers made some progress in understanding delirium tremens and the
neurological complications of syphilis, which was then responsible for
10% of U.S. mental-hospital admissions. But care remained primitive.

In the 1930s and '40s, U.S. psychiatry underwent a revolution, triggered
by the arrival and widespread acceptance of the work of Sigmund Freud.
Freudian psychoanalysis "often explained mental ills in ways that were
bizarre, erroneous, misdirected, confusing, and sometimes harmful,"
Hobson and Leonard write, but "its theories were based on keen
observations of human behavior that seemed at least as good as any
others available at the time."

Freud's ideas ruled American psychiatry until the 1950s, but then the
Freudian dynasty began to fall apart. Tranquilizers, led by Miltown, and
then Librium and Valium, appeared in the 1950s and '60s, just as several
landmark studies were showing that Freudian psychoanalysis was of little
help to mental patients. American psychiatry then underwent its second
revolution, this time deserting Freudian theory for an unholy devotion
to the new medicines. Psychotherapy was largely abandoned, and many
mental hospitals were emptied and shuttered.

It is now widely accepted that the best treatment for mental illness is
a combination of drugs, which alleviate symptoms, and current forms of
non-Freudian psychotherapy, which get at the social and psychological
elements of the disorders. Yet drugs began to replace therapy. By the
1980s and '90s, that trend accelerated as insurance companies and
health-maintenance organizations, aiming to reduce costs, seized on
drugs as a cheaper alternative to therapy. The care of the mentally ill
was fractured: Psychiatrists prescribed pills, and psychotherapy, if
provided at all, was done by psychologists or social workers, whose
hourly rate undercut that of psychiatrists. Communication between the
two is often sporadic, and, as a result, most patients receive
inadequate care. And Hobson and Leonard estimate that there are 2
million Americans with severe mental illness receiving no treatment
whatsoever.

This tragic breakdown in care has paralleled an explosion in scientific
understanding of mental illness. Hobson and Leonard provide a neat
summary of recent progress in brain science and the treatments it has
led to. In a concluding section, they also call for a rebuilding of the
mental-health-care system so as to give patients access to drugs,
psychotherapy, and long-term coordinated care. "While such programs
would cost money, they would probably cost less than what HMOs,
insurance companies, families of the mentally ill, and a broad array of
government institutions from jails to homeless shelters are now paying
to provide low-quality, underfinanced, and fragmented services," they
write.

It's hard to know exactly what their rational, humane system might cost.
What is clear is the high social cost of doing nothing: Many of the
mentally ill are cast adrift, without treatment, until they end up
broke, homeless, or in prison. Surely America owes them more than that.

Senior Writer Raeburn covers science and medicine.

Copyright 2000-2001, by The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights
reserved.

--
Jeffry P. Ricker, Ph.D.          Office Phone:  (480) 423-6213
9000 E. Chaparral Rd.            FAX Number: (480) 423-6298
Psychology Department            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scottsdale Community College
Scottsdale, AZ  85256-2626

Listowner: Psychologists Educating Students to Think Skeptically (PESTS)

http://www.sc.maricopa.edu/sbscience/pests/index.html


Reply via email to