Harry, Richard, et al.:
Can we assume that your children heard the "good stuff" while in the womb,
but never again after their birth? I would venture that my 9 y.o. likes
the Beatles predominantly due to her repeated exposure to it (clicks,
pops, scratches and all) in our household during her 9 years of life, and
not due to hearing it during her 9 months in the womb.
Neither the Walrus nor the Eggman,
-Max
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Richard Pisacreta wrote:
> <DIV></DIV> <P> <P></P>>From: "Harry Avis"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><BR>> <BR>>Maybe ther is something to this
> after all, though, my son, who is <BR>>30, <BR>>listens to the
> Stones, Jefferson Airplane, Big Brother and the <BR>>Holding
> <BR>>Company and Quick Silver Messenger Service, all of which he
> <BR>>undoubtedly <BR>>heard in the womb. <BR>> <BR>My kids, 16
> & 18, prefer the Beatles, Bob Dylan, Joplin, and other 60s people
> too. However, womb aside, they claim its easier to hear what the singer
> is saying, and the message is more meaningful or interesting that most
> of the crap currently passing as "music".</DIV> <DIV> </DIV>
> <DIV>Pink Floyd Rules!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Rip
>
Maxwell Gwynn, PhD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Psychology (519) 884-0710 ext 3854
Wilfrid Laurier University
Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3C5 Canada
