On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:46:27 -0800, Christopher D. Green wrote:
>Mike,
>
>I agree with almost all of this, except that you seem to have mistaken 
>cable "news" television for science (or scholarship more generally). 
>It's not about finding facts. It's about keeping the viewers entertained 
>until the commercials come on. It's a business. Note, it doesn't 
>actually matter much what the facts of Eliot Spitzer's affairs are to 
>anyone but his family (either you wouldn't vote for a man who buys sex, 
>or you think it is irrelevant to his job as a government official), but 
>it is entertaining (for many) to see him grovel a bit and perhaps get 
>just a hint or two of the sordid details.

Although today's news organizations often appear to be in the
infotainment business in contrast to their old "straight news"
orientation in long past where the news division was not expected
to turn a profit but instead was to serve the public by providing
it with useful information, afflicting the comfortable, and attacking
those in positions of power, especially public officials, who abuse
their power.  The area of "investigative journalism" is representative
of this view; consider the short Wikipedia entry on it (Standard
disclaimers apply), see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Investigative_journalism
In earlier times this was also called "muckraker journalism", see
the Wiki entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muckraker
Perhaps one of the greatest or classic example of such journalism
was the work of Jacob Riis who's "How the Other Half Lives"
showed many how the immigrant poor lived in the slums of
Manhattan's Lower East Side; see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Riis
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_the_Other_Half_Lives

More recent examples include the release of the Pentagon Papers,
Woodward and Bernstein's reporting on the Watergate break-in
and related crimes, the Iran-Contra drugs for guns deals, and
Syemour Hersh's reporting in the New Yorker on the Iraq war; see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seymour_Hersh

The PBS series "Frontline" continue to provide documentaries in
this vein and the PBS news hour related news programs try to
maintain high standards in reporting and, perhaps the most important
role the new media has, speaking truth to power when it tries to lie.

Unfortunately, the playwrght and sceenwriter Paddy Chayefsky
anticipated what might happen to network news when it was expected
to justify its existence through ratings and market share in his screenplay
for the Sidney Lumet film "Network"; see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_%28film%29
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paddy_Chayefsky
(By the way, Chayefsky's novel "Altered States" was a great read and
was a great portrayal of academic research gone wrong -- Ken Russell
completely botched making a movie out of the novel, so don't confuse
the movie for the book).

Today, journalism as a business is pretty much a joke.  Journalism as
a professional career which has at its core getting the "true story" instead
of the "official version" or the "spun version", which holds to its code of
ethics (see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism_ethics_and_standards )
still plays a significant role in telling us about the world and why it
operates the way that it does.

>By the way, what are they doing to Washington Square? I was there a 
>couple of days ago and it looked like a WWI battlefield.

Renovation of the park.  See:
http://www.nycgovparks.org/sub_your_park/washington_sq_park/reconstruction.php
In the first stage of rennovation, the western part of the park (i.e., where 
most of
the drug dealers hunt out and the chess tables used in "Searching for Bobby
Fischer" were located) was closed down and re-landscaped.  The fountain was
also moved to make it aligned with the Arch, that is, now one will be able to
see the fountain through the arch if looking south on Fifth avenue.  One reason
why the fountain was "off center" was because there was a road going through
the park which connected Fifth avenue to what is now LaGuardia place (a
continuation of West Broadway above Houston Street).  Buses would come down
Fifth avenue, goe through the park, and wind up south of the park.  The Sixth
Avenue elevated subway, now long gone, came up from downtown along West
Broadway and turned westward at what is not LaGuardia Place and West 3rd
street until it reached 6th avenue/Avenue of the America and turned right/north
uptown. Today, the IFC Center/theater is at the junction of where West 3rd St
ends and the el would have turned.

Now the eastern part of the park in being renovated which is what you saw.  For
more info including some of the background issues, see:
http://www.thevillager.com/villager_238/washingtonsquareparkrenova.html
and
http://www.flickr.com/photos/70118...@n00/sets/72157603687378665/
and
http://gothamist.com/2008/01/24/washington_squa_6.php
and from the NYU student newspaper:
http://nyunews.com/topics/locations/washington-square-park/#/news/2009/09/21/park/?ref=ajax

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]







---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=1189
or send a blank email to 
leave-1189-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to