The false positive I identified in the threat starting post was on in which I 
was unable to identify on the supposed source webpage any of the words or 
phrases that was part of the sentence that had been flagged by SafeAssign. Not 
even a common phrase within the flagged sentence was on the webpage that was 
identified as the source. 

So, for me, a horrible false positive that simply shouldn't occur if the 
software was worth a darn.

Paul Bernhardt
Dept of Psychology
Frostburg State University
pcbernhardt _at_ frostburg _dot_ edu


On Mar 23, 2010, at 7:54 PM, [email protected] wrote:

>  
> 
> Of course, the benefit of using services, such as Turnitin, is that you can 
> have the student submit the work and the service automatically provides you 
> with a report of all of the material that it has identified as being 
> problematic. For those instructors that teach large classes and have a lot of 
> papers to check, these types of services can save a lot of time and effort 
> and are, in my opinion, well worth the investment. 
>  
> As for false positives, I am not exactly sure how these are being defined in 
> this discussion, but one issue that I believe is happening increasingly is 
> that certain sentences that are flagged down as having been copied from other 
> sources tend to be nothing more than common expressions used by inexperienced 
> writers or some other sort of match that strongly suggest pure coincidence. 
> Thus, for example, when I see a Turnitin report that lists several instances 
> of 'plagiarism', say 20% that amount to separate 1% or 2% snippets each from 
> a different source, particularly if these are identified as being from 
> different students from various other universities for a total of 10-12 
> different web pages, my sense is that these are likely coincidental matches 
> (i.e., false positives?). As Ken points out, plagiarism is often done by lazy 
> students whose MO tends to be the misappropriation of larger chunks of text 
> from a couple of sources. After all, getting smaller amounts of material from 
> many different sources is much more work than most lazy students are willing 
> to do! ;-)
>  
> Ken, I wonder if you would deem it appropriate -and/or if it is not too much 
> trouble- to share with us how it was that these students were able to fool 
> the service that your institution was testing.
>  
> Miguel
>  
>  
> 
> 
> Paul Bernhardt wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > I want to thank folks for their responses to my question. 
> > 
> > I was suspecting false negatives might be a problem, too.
> > 
> > If y'all have more to share on plagiarism software in general, I'm happy 
> > to hear more. I may want to build some ammunition to take to our IT people. 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> 
> 
> I am not a fan of any of the well-known commercial 
> anti-plagiarism packages because I can generate both false 
> positives and false negatives easily.
> 
> One semester, I offered extra-credit in a couple of classes to 
> students who could sneak plagiarised material past a commercial 
> package and show me how they did it.  More than 80% of the 
> students in the classes could do so and several students showed 
> me more than 1 way.
> 
> (We were testing the product for adoption. I am amazed that 
> schools are buying these services without testing.  Instead, 
> schools seem to rely on sales pitches and testimonials.)
> 
> Finally, many cases of plagiarism are done by very lazy students. 
>   Doing Google searches on suspicious phrases often produces the 
> copied document on the first page of searches.
> 
> Ken
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  [email protected]
> Professor and Assistant Chairperson
> Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu
> Appalachian State University
> Boone, NC 28608
> USA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13482.917fac06d4daae681dabfe964ca8c74e&n=T&l=tips&o=1483
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-1483-13482.917fac06d4daae681dabfe964ca8c...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13441.4e79e96ebb5671bdb50111f18f263003&n=T&l=tips&o=1487
> (It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken)
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-1487-13441.4e79e96ebb5671bdb50111f18f263...@fsulist.frostburg.edu







---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=1496
or send a blank email to 
leave-1496-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to