Ken, thank you very much for sharing your experiences with plagiarism 
detection. Your efforts mirror, in part, those reported in a 2003 presentation 
at EPA from former TIPSter Miriam Joseph who compared Google’s search abilities 
with those of a major APS . My recollection is that both tools’ ability to find 
plagiarism was roughly equivalent, with Google actually having a slight edge 
over the APS . 



  

That neither most APSs nor Google can enter the invisible web (i.e., 
pass-protected databases) is a major drawback of these tools. Turnitin does 
have a spin off, ithenticate, http://www.ithenticate.com/ , which is targeted 
to professional journal and book publishers and is associated with another 
service, CrossCheck, http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck.html , which does have 
access part of the invisible web. However, I believe that Turnitin does not yet 
tap those databases that are accessible to Ithenticate even thought they are 
owned by the same parent company, iParadigms. Thus, if students are taking 
material from journal articles which can only be accessed via a password, the 
material will not be flagged –at least not the first time it is submitted. 



  

Miguel 





----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Steele" <[email protected]> 
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 2:22:45 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [tips] Using SafeAssign [Now anti-plagiarism service issues] 

[email protected] wrote: 
> 
> Ken, I wonder if you would deem it appropriate -and/or if it is not too 
> much trouble- to share with us how it was that these students were able 
> to fool the service that your institution was testing. 
> 

Miguel asked for some examples of problems I encountered with a 
well-known service. (I won't mention the service because my 
examples are a couple of years old and the situation may have 
changed. I will call it APS, anti-plagiarism service.) 

1.  The problem of identifying the "real" original. 

I uploaded one of my "Mozart effect" papers which contained 
several phrases that I had seen quoted in newspapers.  The APS 
passed it with a clean bill of health.  Clearly the service was 
not doing much looking on the net. 

I was showing this issue to a colleague at another machine on 
campus and he was flagged as plagiarising the paper from my 
contribution. 

After playing around with various contributions, here is what I 
was able to do.  The APS didn't check the entire net.  Instead it 
appeared to be keeping a record of a few select sites, including 
the home institution website.  The first contribution encountered 
by the system was counted as "the original" and subsequent 
contributions were treated as cases of plagiarism.  So, for 
example, I could go to (e.g.) Stanford and grab some document 
from a web site there and upload it to the APS at ASU.  It would 
be given a clean bill of health.  Anyone at ASU who uploaded a 
similar document thereafter would be flagged as plagiarising my 
"original contribution." 

2.  The APS did not monitor primary literature. 

I went to PSYCHinfo and began to cut and paste from well-known to 
famous experiments, published in various JEP journals.  The APS 
never complained and passed them all as being original contributions. 

Also, I submitted sections from well-known reference works 
without receiving complaints from the APS. 

3.  The APS did not monitor famous textbooks. 

Here is where my students made their contributions.  They 
discovered that the APS would let them submit large sections from 
various textbooks without being flagged. 

Also, they discovered that the APS seemed to be biased towards 
english-language sources.  They submitted famous poetry and 
song-lyrics from other languages without any hassle. 

My conclusion was that the APS worked if students were using each 
others papers on a particular campus or a few web sites. 
Otherwise, the institution was paying for a lot of nothing. 

Ken 

--------------------------------------------------------------- 
Kenneth M. Steele, Ph.D.                  [email protected] 
Professor and Assistant Chairperson 
Department of Psychology          http://www.psych.appstate.edu 
Appalachian State University 
Boone, NC 28608 
USA 
--------------------------------------------------------------- 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=1513
or send a blank email to 
leave-1513-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to