Like. ;-)

 
GPeterson


On May 9, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Michael Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was observed by someone that most of what is written isn't worth reading.
> If that is so, then it probably follows that 99.999 % of what is
> twittered, facebooked, and blogged isn't worth noting either.
> 
> One couldn't be twitterjacked, faceviolated, and bloggjammed if one
> didn't have such accounts.
> Perhaps it's time for all right thinking people to eschew such melodrama :-)
> 
> --Mike
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Mike Palij <[email protected]> wrote:
>> If you don't know who Jurgen Habermas is, then you've
>> got some learning to do.  Honestly, when I have been exposed
>> to Habermas in classes I took long ago, the context did not
>> engender a receptive attitude toward him.  But it seems that
>> there are number of ideas that he has that may be useful to
>> us as a global society. But I digress.
>> 
>> First, I don't know how many Tipsters have Twitter accounts
>> but I wonder how many have been "twitterjacked", that is,
>> learn that there is a twitter account the claims to be yours
>> when in fact it is someone else.  Habermas was twitterjacked
>> with tweets containing quotes from his writings.  Turns out
>> the fake twitter account was set-up by a Brazilian Ph.D.
>> student studying politics in the US.  The student has not
>> provided his real name or where he is studying (his Ph.D.
>> program might take a serious interest is such activities --
>> what kind of ethical breech is it to make believe you're some
>> you're not on the internet?  What Would The APA Say and Do?)
>> 
>> Anyway, an interesting article in the Financial Times highlights
>> the twitterjacking as well as interviews Habermas, putting
>> some of his ideas into historical and contemporary context; see:
>> http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eda3bcd8-5327-11df-813e-00144feab49a.html
>> 
>> Regarding psychological content, Habermas was a student of
>> Theodor Adorno of Authoritarian Personality fame (and an example
>> of the importance of having your last name start with an "A"),
>> about whom Habermas has a few things to say.
>> 
>> I came across this article because I was looking for material on
>> Martin Heidegger (about whom Habermas has few kind words
>> to say), who is the subject of a couple of books reviewed in
>> today's Sunday NY Time book review; see:
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/books/review/Kirsch-t.html?nl=books&emc=booksupdateema1&pagewanted=all
>> 
>> Heidegger, a rehabilitated Nazi, is somewhat in vogue in cognitive
>> science and artificial intelligence, in part for his ideas on 
>> intentionality;see:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentionality
>> and
>> http://www.jstor.org/pss/2108053
>> and, perhaps of greatest interest to psychologists because it provides
>> a perspective on the development of cognitive science in the second
>> half of the 20th century, is this paper by Hubert Dreyfus on
>> Heidegger and Heideggerian AI:
>> http://leidlmair.at/doc/WhyHeideggerianAIFailed.pdf
>> 
>> The books reviewed in the NY Times focus on Heidegger's
>> Nazi activities and the extent to which his philosophical
>> viewpoint was used to support a Nazi ideology.  Given
>> the influence Heidegger has had on cognitive science, either
>> directly or indirectly (Dreyfus points out how Heidegger's
>> concerns are manifested in various theories and research
>> programs even though Heidegger is not cited), is there a
>> problem in using Heidegger's writing and ideas?  How much
>> should one emphasize his Nazi past? Or should we just
>> ignore the whole situation and do our work or twitterjack
>> account of famous psychologists (is Skinner tweeting these
>> days?).
>> 
>> Oh, Happy Mother's Day, y'all!
>> 
>> -Mike Palij
>> New York University
>> [email protected]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe click here: 
>> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13541.42a7e8017ab9578358f118300f4720fb&n=T&l=tips&o=2544
>> or send a blank email to 
>> leave-2544-13541.42a7e8017ab9578358f118300f472...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
>> 
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe click here: 
> http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13445.e3edca0f6e68bfb76eaf26a8eb6dd94b&n=T&l=tips&o=2545
> or send a blank email to 
> leave-2545-13445.e3edca0f6e68bfb76eaf26a8eb6dd...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
> 


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=2547
or send a blank email to 
leave-2547-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to