Hi

The paper can be read at

http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/653808 

Although Chris has focused on the course evaluation part, the bulk of
the paper concerns learning in current and future related courses.  Some
faculty promote learning better in current courses and some in future
courses, and the two are negatively related (I think ... complex
analyses by economists!).  Final section on course evaluations concerns
fact that evaluations correlate positively with current value added and
negatively with later value added.  Experience and rank tends to
correlate in the opposite direction, that is, negative with current and
positive with later.

A couple of caveats ... these are math courses and the students score
high on math SATs, so we are talking about good students here.  Also
probably highly motivated given they are in Air Force Academy.  I could
not find the range of course evaluation scores, but my guess would be
that they too would be quite high.  Finally, the "value added" measures
for current and future courses presumably (I did not take the time to
work through their logic / analysis) are some sort of residual scores. 
And residual scores can demonstrate "unusual" relationships with one
another and with predictors (e.g., being negatively related under
certain circumstances).

All in all though, an interesting study especially as students are
randomly assigned to sections of courses.  The authors suggest some
possible mechanisms for the negative association between current and
future learning (assuming it is real and not a statistical artifact). 
Here's penultimate paragraph:

"One potential explanation for our results is that the less
experienced
professors may adhere more strictly to the regimented curriculum being
tested, whereas the more experienced professors broaden the curriculum
and produce students with a deeper understanding of the material.
This deeper understanding results in better achievement in the follow
on
courses. Another potential mechanism is that students may learn
(good or bad) study habits depending on the manner in which their
introductory course is taught. For example, introductory professors
who
*teach to the test* may induce students to exert less study effort
in follow on
related courses. This may occur because of a false signal of one*s
own ability or an erroneous expectation of how follow-on courses will
be taught by other professors. A final, more cynical, explanation
could
also relate to student effort. Students of low-value-added professors
in
the introductory course may increase effort in follow-on courses to
help
*erase* their lower than expected grade in the introductory
course."

Study is also clearly relevant to this list and raises the interesting
point that we can do certain things to promote immediate learning and
certain things to promote long-term learning, but the two "things" might
not be the same!

Take care
Jim


James M. Clark
Professor of Psychology
204-786-9757
204-774-4134 Fax
[email protected]
 
Department of Psychology
University of Winnipeg
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3B 2E9
CANADA


>>> "Christopher D. Green" <[email protected]> 15-Jun-10 8:02 AM >>>
Getting good evaluations from your students? Perhaps you're not
teaching 
them enough. According to a recent study conducted at the US Air Force

Academy: "professors who rate highly among students tend to teach 
students less. Professors who teach students more tend to get bad 
ratings from their students."

Here's a Washington Post report: 
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/college-inc/2010/06/study_high-rated_professors_ar.html


Chris
-- 

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

 

416-736-2100 ex. 66164
[email protected] 
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ 

==========================


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here:
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a891720c9&n=T&l=tips&o=3101

or send a blank email to
leave-3101-13251.645f86b5cec4da0a56ffea7a89172...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=3105
or send a blank email to 
leave-3105-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to