On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:50:14 -0700,, Scott O Lilienfeld wrote:
>To those TIPSters who are interested, Joiner uses the same framework 
>for suicide as an overarching theme in his book - although he adds 
>acquired fearlessness (as a consequence of habituation to thoughts/images,
> etc. of death) as a third causal factor.  In contrast to Mike, I've actually 
>found the ongoing discussion here quite useful and provocative - although 
>that's perhaps because I never saw the discussion here as primarily 
>about how best to prevent suicide 

I have no idea why this discussion was initiated or even maintained.
I did not think it was primarily about suicide prevention outside of a
single case.  

>(I don't know anyone who would seriously contend that bridge barriers 
>are a crucial part of the solution, nor that they say much about the causes of 
>suicidal motivation).  

So, what was the point of focusing on this article?

>Instead, I think that the recent discussion of what 
>kinds of evidence we'd find compelling for preventative effects in 
>naturalistic 
>contexts is actually quite fascinating - and it's helped me to realize that 
>acquiring such evidence is often a heck of a lot more challenging that most 
>people (myself included) had assumed.  ...Scott

If you're not familiar with program evaluation, I'd suggest taking a
look at Shadish, Cook, and Campbell's "Experimental and Quasi-experimental
Designs for Generalized Causal Inference" and McDavid and Hawthorn's
"Program Evaluation & Performance Measurement" where issues of 
establishing causal effects for policy concerns (e.g., demonstrating that
government funded projects produce their intended beneficial effects)
are covered.  Donald Campbell is one of the best known researchers who
was concerned with establishing causal effects in programs operating in
natural contexts..  The Campbell Collaboration (www.campbellcollaboration.org)
focuses on these issues through the use of systematic reviews -- they
mirror the Cochrane Collabarotion (www.cochrane.org ) which focus on
evidence-based medicine and health care.  Here is a list of topics that
the Campbell collaboration either intends to review or has reviewed:

http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/lib/index.php?go=browse&sort=title&view=all&;
 

For those truly serious about this topic, I have two words:  Propensity scores.
Shadish, Cook & Campbell cover this idea in their Chapter 5 but some may find
the following article more to the point:

http://erx.sagepub.com/content/29/6/530.abstract

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]

P.S. This is my third and last post today.


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=3692
or send a blank email to 
leave-3692-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to