On 6 Nov 2010 at 15:30, Rick Froman wrote:

    There was an issue of Psychological Science in the Public 
    Interest devoted to this issue in 2007, available for free here: 
    http://www.psychologicalscience.org/journals/pspi/pspi_8_1_
    article.pdf 

>Their conclusion from the Abstract: <snip>"There are no 
> single or simple answers to the complex questions about sex 
> differences in science and mathematics."

By happenstance, I just stumbled on a new study,  published in 
the most recent issue of _Current Directions in Psychological 
Science_, but only available for $$$. 

They come to a bolder conclusion, namely  "preferences and 
choices-both freely made and constrained-are the most 
significant cause of women´s underrepresentation" .

_Science Daily_ has an informative news  item on it headed 
"Women's Choices, Not Abilities, Keep Them out of Math-
Intensive Fields at http://tinyurl.com/2f3bo59
 
It has the obligatory nod to the Larry Summers affair. 

Stephen 

Ceci, S. and Williams, W. (2010) Sex Differences in Math-
Intensive Fields _Current Directions in Psychological Science_ 
October 2010 19: 275-279, first published on October 4, 2010 
doi:10.1177/0963721410383241
abstract at 
http://cdp.sagepub.com/content/19/5/275.abstract

--------------------------------------------
Stephen L. Black, Ph.D.          
Professor of Psychology, Emeritus   
Bishop's University
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada               
e-mail:  sblack at ubishops.ca
---------------------------------------------

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=6302
or send a blank email to 
leave-6302-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to