This seems more like a personal debate or disagreement to me. I feel as though my bandwidth is being wasted. Yada, yada, yada.
---- Original message ---- >Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 11:41:06 -0500 >From: "Mike Palij" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [tips] For When You're Covering Ethics in Research >To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" ><[email protected]> >Cc: "Mike Palij" <[email protected]> > >On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 06:58:56 -0800, Jim Clark wrote: >> "Mike Palij" <[email protected]> 01-Mar-11 7:35 AM >>> >>>On Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 20:58:54 -0600, Jim Clark wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> What are the grounds for thinking that any of this is relevant to the >>>>vast majority of psychological or other social science research? >>> >>>The vagueness and lack of specificity of the question at first made >>>think that if (a) the writer is not a researcher and/or (b) not doing >>>research in the U.S., then he was unaware of the U.S. federal >>>requirement to abide by the guidelines provided by the U.S. >>>Dept of Health and Human Service and its Office for Human >>>Research Protections. Any institution that receives federal funding, >>>I believe, is required to have an ethics in research course, such as >>>this model course: >>> http://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/montana_round1/research_ethics.html >> >>Jim Clark responded: >>I guess "this" was too vague as much in your subsequent tutorial on the >>ethics >>industry had little to do with your original post, which focused on the harm >>being done in some cases of medical research. > . Robert W. Wildblood, PhD Adjunct Psychology Faculty Germanna Community College [email protected] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=9093 or send a blank email to leave-9093-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
