On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:44:53 -0800, Jeffry Ricker wrote: >On Nov 16, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Mike Palij wrote: >> Actually, Beth Benoit noted this with a link to a New Scientist article > >Actually, I meant that I didn't think anyone has posted a link to this >particular article. I thought some might want to read it because we have been >discussing this case.
Actually, I stand corrected. The Chronicle article does appear to provide more coverage of the relevant issues but it seems to me leave some issues unresolved. And is it just me or does the journal "Psychological Science" pop up an uncomfortable number of times in the article? -Mike Palij New York University [email protected] --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=14226 or send a blank email to leave-14226-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
