On 12/2/11 9:44 AM, Horton, Joseph J. wrote:
> Apparently there are replication issues in biology as well as 
> psychology. The Wall Street Journal has an article today about 
> pharmaceutical companies attempting to develop drugs based on 
> published findings only to find that they cannot replicate the findings.

Not so much biological journals as medical journals. This is, perhaps, 
because pharmaceutical "research" has become a rather dubious 
proposition since the pharmaceutical companies took over the testing of 
their own drugs (he who pays the piper calls to tune, and all that). 
Some major medical journal editors have noted recently (after their 
tenures were over, of course) that the journals have been more or less 
subsumed under the marketing departments of the pharmaceutical companies 
(who not only pay for much of the "research" that they publish, but also 
subsidize the journals directly by buying expensive ads in the journals 
themselves).

For relevant quotations, see:
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138

Here in Toronto there have been two high profile cases in which 
pharmaceutical companies were accused of attempting to interfere with 
careers of medical researchers who went public with their concerns over 
the (unreported) side effects of drugs they were conducting 
(industry-financed) research on: Nancy Olivieri and David Healy.

Chris
-- 

Christopher D. Green
Department of Psychology
York University
Toronto, ON M3J 1P3
Canada

416-736-2100 ex. 66164
[email protected]
http://www.yorku.ca/christo/

==========================


---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=14576
or send a blank email to 
leave-14576-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to