On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 07:10:23 -0800, Annette Taylor wrote:
>I'm a bit distracted and may not have read all of the posts very closely but I
>note that at least the blog post BEGINS with an SAT of 1200 on a 1600 point
>scale. (I have not taken the time to read the article)

I'm note completely sure I know what you're referring to but
if you are talking about the x-axis for the figure in the blog
(Figure 2 in the article), the lowest value is 400-1200.

In the article the authors write:

|The regression results imply that a student with a (hypothetical) SAT
|score of 0 can expect a 1.19 units lower grade from a Republican
|professor than from a Democratic one, while for a student with a SAT
|score of 700 (the lowest score in the sample) the difference is 0.54 grade
|units. In contrast, a student with a perfect SAT score of 1,600 can expect
|a 0.30 units higher grade from a Republican professor than from a
|Democratic one.

So, their lowest SAT total score was 700.  Their mean SAT score
was 1359 with SD= 116 (see Table 2).which make a score of 700 an
outlier (z= -5.68). I haven't looked at the raw data but I assume that
the SAT score distribution is negatively skewed.

-Mike Palij
New York University
[email protected]

---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=15235
or send a blank email to 
leave-15235-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to