It does seem excessive, but keep in mind that the final report probably 
includes copies of the published articles examined, including the type-written  
submitted versions, referee reports, journal correspondence, email 
correspondence of various individuals involved with Das , data sheets, 
statistical analyses print-outs, experts' reports, depositions, etc. It all can 
add up. 



Miguel 



----- Original Message -----


From: "Marie Helweg-Larsen" <[email protected]> 
To: "Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS)" 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 11:39:12 AM 
Subject: RE: [tips] OH NO! Not the Wine Research! 



  


  


  



I was particularly fascinated by the NY Times statement that a special review 
board had produced a “60,000-page report” which had a 60-page summary. Even 
with an examination of 100s of articles it is hard to imagine how you could 
fill that many pages. Now kids – how much would that report even weigh? 

Marie 

  

**************************************************** 
Marie Helweg-Larsen, Ph.D. 
Associate Professor of Psychology, Dickinson College 

Kaufman 168, Phone 717 245-1562 

http://users.dickinson.edu/~helwegm/index.html 
**************************************************** 

  

From: Michael Palij [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 10:11 AM 
To: Teaching in the Psychological Sciences (TIPS) 
Cc: Michael Palij 
Subject: [tips] OH NO! Not the Wine Research! 

  

  

  

  

The NY Times has an article on the alleged research fraud 
by Dipak K. Das of the University of Connecticut who reported 
on the beneficial effects of drinking wine.  The fraud is 
extensive and affects 11 scientific journals.  Here is the 
NY Times article: 
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/12/science/fraud-charges-for-dipak-k-das-a-university-of-connecticut-researcher.html
 

More detail, including quotes from UConn's press release on 
the matter is available on "Retraction Watch" website; see: 
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2012/01/11/uconn-resveratrol-researcher-dipak-das-fingered-in-sweeping-misconduct-case/
 

One thing that should be noted is the final paragraph of the 
NY Times article which I quote here: 

|Dr. Das was a prolific publisher of research. His name 
|appears on 588 articles listed in Google Scholar, though 
|some may be by other researchers with the same name and 
|initials. Most of the articles concern the effect of drugs 
|on the heart, including 117 articles on resveratrol. 

There are a number of problems with using Google Scholar, 
especially for (a) determining the number of articles a 
researcher has published and (b) citation analysis.  The 
Thomson Reuters service "Web of Science" (WoS), originally 
developed by the folks who created science/social 
science/humanities citation indexes, allows one to identify 
how many articles one has published (at least as represented 
in its comprehensive database) and the number of citations 
each article has.  

For Das, WoS lists him as having 124 articles, a mean citation 
per article of 9.44, and an h number of 22.  Excluding 
self-citation, there are 998 citations of his research. 

So, Google Scholar inflates the number of articles that a 
specific researcher has publishes (when I checked for 
my pubs, GS provided multiple hits for a single article which 
explain the article inflation).  WoS will provide a conservative 
estimate of the number of publications that a researcher has 
because it does not include all possible journals in its 
database (e.g., I have a pub in an obscure journal which 
was not in the database but, when it was cited by another 
researcher -- thanks David ;-) -- I pointed this out and 
it is now included in WoS sometimes).  WoS gives a better 
estimate of the impact of Das's work but there probably 
is still some "error" in it. 

-Mike Palij 
New York University 
[email protected] 





--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13234.b0e864a6eccfc779c8119f5a4468797f&n=T&l=tips&o=15265
 

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-15265-13234.b0e864a6eccfc779c8119f5a44687...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 

  

  


--- 

You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected] . 

To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce629&n=T&l=tips&o=15267
 

(It may be necessary to cut and paste the above URL if the line is broken) 

or send a blank email to 
leave-15267-466839.0421d1005414eed82340aa280e7ce...@fsulist.frostburg.edu 


  


 
---
You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe click here: 
http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=15268
or send a blank email to 
leave-15268-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu

Reply via email to