The Bem article has been used as an example of the failure of null hypothesis significance testing to protect us adequately against chance findings (Wagenmaker's Bayesian analysis is particularly good in explaining this). Does Ritche have any comment on that aspect?
Put another, I suppose, how does he think it came about that Bem got significant results in 8 of 9 studies, if there is no real effect? Best, Chris --- Christopher D. Green Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON M3J 1P3 Canada [email protected] http://www.yorku.ca/christo/ ========================== On 2012-03-28, at 11:03 AM, Michael Britt wrote: > I'm going to be interviewing Stuart Ritchie - lead author of the recent > failed replication of the Bem study. In addition to reviewing the Bem study > and then discussing Ritchie's replication are there any other questions you'd > like me to ask? > > I was also thinking of asking him about his experiences with JPSP. I > understand that JPSP wouldn't review his study since it was a replication. > I'd like to hear what Ritchie has to say about that. Anything else? > > Michael > > Michael A. Britt, Ph.D. > [email protected] > http://www.ThePsychFiles.com > Twitter: mbritt > > > > > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. > To unsubscribe click here: > http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62bd92&n=T&l=tips&o=16982 > or send a blank email to > leave-16982-430248.781165b5ef80a3cd2b14721caf62b...@fsulist.frostburg.edu --- You are currently subscribed to tips as: [email protected]. To unsubscribe click here: http://fsulist.frostburg.edu/u?id=13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df5d5&n=T&l=tips&o=16993 or send a blank email to leave-16993-13090.68da6e6e5325aa33287ff385b70df...@fsulist.frostburg.edu
